Akao Masaharu, Yamashita Takeshi, Fukuzawa Masayuki, Hayashi Takuya, Okumura Ken
Department of Cardiology National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center Kyoto Japan.
The Cardiovascular Institute Tokyo Japan.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 6;13(3):e031506. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031506. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
The ELDERCARE-AF trial showed that low-dose edoxaban benefits elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation considered ineligible for standard oral anticoagulants due to high bleeding risk, but whether this applied to patients with extremely low body weight was unclear.
This was a prespecified subanalysis by body weight (≤45, >45 kg) of the phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven ELDERCARE-AF trial, which compared low-dose edoxaban (15 mg once daily) with placebo in Japanese patients considered ineligible for oral anticoagulants at the recommended therapeutic strength or the approved doses. The primary efficacy and safety end points were stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding (International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis definition), respectively. The ≤45-kg weight group included 374/984 patients (38.0%), and the >45-kg group included 610/984 patients (62.0%). The stroke or systemic embolism rate was lower with edoxaban than placebo in both weight groups (≤45 kg: hazard ratio [HR], 0.36 [95% CI, 0.16-0.80]; >45 kg: HR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.13-0.73]; interaction =0.82). Major bleeding incidence was numerically higher with edoxaban than placebo (≤45 kg: HR, 3.05 [95% CI, 0.84-11.11]; >45 kg: HR, 1.40 [95% CI, 0.56-3.48), with no interaction with body weight (interaction =0.33). All-cause mortality was higher in the ≤45-kg group, with no significant difference between treatment groups.
The benefit of edoxaban 15 mg was consistent in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation and extremely low body weight, though clinicians must remain vigilant about the risk of major bleeding, especially gastrointestinal bleeding.
ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02801669.
老年房颤抗凝治疗(ELDERCARE-AF)试验表明,低剂量艾多沙班对因出血风险高而被认为不适合使用标准口服抗凝剂的老年非瓣膜性房颤患者有益,但这是否适用于体重极低的患者尚不清楚。
这是对3期多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照事件驱动的老年房颤抗凝治疗试验按体重(≤45、>45 kg)进行的预先设定的亚组分析,该试验在被认为不适合使用推荐治疗强度或批准剂量口服抗凝剂的日本患者中,比较了低剂量艾多沙班(每日15 mg)与安慰剂。主要疗效和安全性终点分别为卒中或全身性栓塞和大出血(国际血栓与止血学会定义)。体重≤45 kg组包括374/984例患者(38.0%),体重>45 kg组包括610/984例患者(62.0%)。在两个体重组中,艾多沙班治疗的卒中或全身性栓塞发生率均低于安慰剂(≤45 kg:风险比[HR],0.36[95%CI,0.16 - 0.80];>45 kg:HR,0.31[95%CI,0.13 - 0.73];交互作用=0.82)。艾多沙班治疗的大出血发生率在数值上高于安慰剂(≤45 kg:HR,3.05[95%CI,0.84 - 11.11];>45 kg:HR,1.40[95%CI,0.56 - 3.48]),且与体重无交互作用(交互作用=0.33)。全因死亡率在体重≤45 kg组更高,治疗组之间无显著差异。
15 mg艾多沙班对体重极低的老年房颤患者的益处是一致的,尽管临床医生必须对大出血风险,尤其是胃肠道出血风险保持警惕。
ClinicalTrials.gov。标识符:NCT02801669。