Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico 'G. Rodolico-San Marco', University of Catania, s Sofia, 78, Catania 95123, Italy.
Gill Heart and Vascular Institute and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Eur Heart J. 2024 Feb 21;45(8):572-585. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad876.
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitor is the standard antithrombotic treatment after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Several trials have challenged guideline-recommended DAPT after PCI by testing the relative clinical effect of an aspirin-free antiplatelet approach-consisting of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course (mostly 1-3 months) of DAPT-among patients undergoing PCI without a concomitant indication for oral anticoagulation (OAC). Overall, these studies have shown P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short DAPT to be associated with a significant reduction in the risk of bleeding without an increase in thrombotic or ischaemic events compared with continued DAPT. Moreover, the effects of the P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy without prior DAPT or following a very short course of DAPT after PCI are being investigated in emerging studies, of which one has recently reported unfavourable efficacy results associated with the aspirin-free approach compared with conventional DAPT. Finally, P2Y12 inhibitor alone has been compared with aspirin alone as chronic therapy after DAPT discontinuation, thus challenging the historical role of aspirin as a standard of care for secondary prevention following PCI. A thorough understanding of study designs, populations, treatments, results, and limitations of trials testing P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs. DAPT or vs. aspirin is required to consider adopting this treatment in clinical practice. This review addresses the use of aspirin-free antiplatelet strategies among patients undergoing PCI without a concomitant indication for OAC, providing an overview of clinical evidence, guideline indications, practical implications, ongoing issues, and future perspectives.
双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT),即阿司匹林和血小板 P2Y12 受体抑制剂联合应用,是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的标准抗血栓治疗方法。几项临床试验通过测试无抗凝治疗(OAC)指征的 PCI 患者中,一种无阿司匹林的抗血小板方法(DAPT 短程治疗后,主要是 1-3 个月,应用 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗)的相对临床效果,对指南推荐的 DAPT 提出了挑战。这些研究总体表明,与继续 DAPT 相比,DAPT 短程治疗后应用 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与出血风险显著降低相关,而血栓形成或缺血性事件无增加。此外,在新兴研究中正在研究无 DAPT 预治疗或 PCI 后非常短程 DAPT 后应用 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗的效果,其中一项研究最近报告了与无阿司匹林方法相比,该方法与不利的疗效结果相关。最后,在 DAPT 停药后,P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗已与单独应用阿司匹林进行了比较,从而对阿司匹林作为 PCI 后二级预防的标准治疗的历史作用提出了挑战。为了考虑在临床实践中采用这种治疗方法,需要全面了解试验设计、人群、治疗方法、结果和局限性,这些试验旨在比较 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与 DAPT 或与阿司匹林的疗效。本综述介绍了无 OAC 指征的 PCI 患者中无阿司匹林的抗血小板策略的应用,概述了临床证据、指南建议、实际影响、当前问题和未来展望。