Department of Joint Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Int J Surg. 2024 Apr 1;110(4):2141-2150. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001103.
To compare the effect of a new complete robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RA-THA) with that of the manual total hip arthroplasty (MTHA) and to verify the accuracy and safety of the former.
Overall, 148 patients were enroled from 3 March 2021 to 28 December 2021 in this study and classified into RA-THA ( n =74 patients) and MTHA ( n =74 patients) groups. The sex, age, operative side, BMI, diagnosis, other basic information, operative time, acetabular prosthesis anteversion and inclination, femoral prosthesis anteversion and angulation, femoral prosthesis filling rate, leg length discrepancy (LLD), Harris hip score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score of the two groups were compared.
No significant differences were observed in the two groups regarding sex, age, operative side, BMI, diagnosis, Harris hip score, VAS score, acetabular inclination, acetabular prosthesis anteversion, femoral prosthesis anteversion, combined anteversion, and femoral prosthesis filling rate ( P >0.05). The operative time was significantly longer in the RA-THA group than in the MTHA group (106.71±25.22 min vs. 79.42±16.16 min; t=7.30, P <0.05). The femoral angulation (1.78°±0.64°) and LLD (2.87±1.55 mm) in the RA-THA group were significantly lesser than those in the MTHA group (2.22°±1.11° and 5.81±6.27 mm, respectively; t=-2.95 and t=-3.88, P <0.05).
The complete RA-THA has some advantages over the traditional procedure in restoring the lower limb length and controlling the femoral prosthesis angulation. Thus, this study verifies the accuracy and safety of the robot-assisted system.
比较新型全机器人辅助髋关节置换术(RA-THA)与传统手动髋关节置换术(MTHA)的疗效,并验证前者的准确性和安全性。
本研究共纳入 2021 年 3 月 3 日至 2021 年 12 月 28 日的 148 例患者,分为 RA-THA 组(n=74 例)和 MTHA 组(n=74 例)。比较两组患者的性别、年龄、手术侧别、BMI、诊断、其他基本信息、手术时间、髋臼假体前倾角和倾斜角、股骨假体前倾角和角度、股骨假体填充率、下肢长度差异(LLD)、Harris 髋关节评分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。
两组患者的性别、年龄、手术侧别、BMI、诊断、Harris 髋关节评分、VAS 评分、髋臼倾斜角、髋臼假体前倾角、股骨假体前倾角、联合前倾角和股骨假体填充率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。RA-THA 组的手术时间明显长于 MTHA 组(106.71±25.22 min 比 79.42±16.16 min;t=7.30,P<0.05)。RA-THA 组的股骨角度(1.78°±0.64°)和 LLD(2.87±1.55 mm)明显小于 MTHA 组(2.22°±1.11°和 5.81±6.27 mm,t=-2.95 和 t=-3.88,P<0.05)。
全机器人辅助髋关节置换术在恢复下肢长度和控制股骨假体角度方面较传统手术具有一定优势,验证了机器人辅助系统的准确性和安全性。