• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用因果结构协方差网络密度(CaSCNd)绘制伴有全身强直阵挛发作的癫痫进展性损伤震中。

Mapping progressive damage epicenters in epilepsy with generalized tonic-clonic seizures by causal structural covariance network density (CaSCNd).

作者信息

Hsieh Hsinyu, Xu Qiang, Zhang Qirui, Yang Fang, Xu Yin, Liu Gaoping, Liu Ruoting, Yu Qianqian, Zhang Zixuan, Lu Guangming, Gu Xing, Zhang Zhiqiang

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, China.

Department of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, China.

出版信息

Brain Res. 2024 Apr 1;1828:148766. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2024.148766. Epub 2024 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2024.148766
PMID:38242522
Abstract

AIMS

Mapping progressive patterns of structural damage in epilepsies with idiopathic and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures with causal structural covariance networks and multiple analysis strategies.

METHODS

Patients with idiopathic generalized tonic-clonic seizures (IGTCS) (n = 114) and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (SGTCS) (n = 125) were recruited. Morphometric parameter of gray matter volume was analyzed on structural MRI. Structural covariance network based on granger causality analysis (CaSCN) was performed on the cross-sectional morphometric data sorted by disease durations of patients. Seed-based CaSCN analysis was firstly carried out to map the progressive and influential patterns of damage to thalamus-related structures. A novel technique for voxel-based CaSCN density (CaSCNd) analysis was further proposed, enabling for identifying the epicenter of structural brain damage during the disease process.

RESULTS

The thalamus-associated CaSCNs demonstrated different patterns of progressive damage in two types of generalized tonic-clonic seizures. In IGTCS, the structural damage was predominantly driven from the thalamus, and expanded to the cortex, while in SGTCS, the damage was predominantly driven from the cortex, and expanded to the thalamus through the basal ganglia. CaSCNd analysis revealed that the IGTCS had an out-effect epicenter in the thalamus, whereas the SGTCS had equipotent in- and out-effects in the thalamus, cortex, and basal ganglia.

CONCLUSION

CaSCN revealed distinct damage patterns in the two types of GTCS, featuring with measurement of structural brain damage from the accumulating effect over a relatively long time period. Our work provided evidence for understanding network impairment mechanism underlying different GTCSs.

摘要

目的

通过因果结构协方差网络和多种分析策略,描绘特发性和继发性全身性强直阵挛性癫痫结构性损伤的进展模式。

方法

招募特发性全身性强直阵挛性癫痫(IGTCS)患者(n = 114)和继发性全身性强直阵挛性癫痫(SGTCS)患者(n = 125)。在结构磁共振成像上分析灰质体积形态学参数。对按患者病程分类的横断面形态学数据进行基于格兰杰因果分析的结构协方差网络(CaSCN)分析。首先进行基于种子点的CaSCN分析,以描绘丘脑相关结构损伤的进展和影响模式。进一步提出一种基于体素的CaSCN密度(CaSCNd)分析新技术,能够识别疾病过程中脑结构损伤的震中。

结果

丘脑相关的CaSCN在两种全身性强直阵挛性癫痫中表现出不同的进展性损伤模式。在IGTCS中,结构损伤主要由丘脑驱动,并扩展到皮质,而在SGTCS中,损伤主要由皮质驱动,并通过基底神经节扩展到丘脑。CaSCNd分析显示,IGTCS在丘脑中存在向外效应震中,而SGTCS在丘脑、皮质和基底神经节中具有等效的向内和向外效应。

结论

CaSCN揭示了两种全身性强直阵挛性癫痫不同的损伤模式,其特点是通过相对较长时间内的累积效应来测量脑结构损伤。我们的工作为理解不同全身性强直阵挛性癫痫潜在的网络损伤机制提供了证据。

相似文献

1
Mapping progressive damage epicenters in epilepsy with generalized tonic-clonic seizures by causal structural covariance network density (CaSCNd).利用因果结构协方差网络密度(CaSCNd)绘制伴有全身强直阵挛发作的癫痫进展性损伤震中。
Brain Res. 2024 Apr 1;1828:148766. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2024.148766. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
2
Idiopathic (Genetic) Generalized Epilepsy特发性(遗传性)全身性癫痫
3
Topiramate versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.托吡酯与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 6;12(12):CD012065. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012065.pub2.
4
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.拉莫三嗪与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 28;6(6):CD001031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001031.pub4.
5
Phenytoin versus valproate monotherapy for partial onset seizures and generalized onset tonic-clonic seizures.苯妥英钠与丙戊酸单药治疗部分性发作和全面性强直阵挛发作的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(4):CD001769. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001769.
6
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.拉莫三嗪与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 14;11(11):CD001031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001031.pub3.
7
Carbamazepine versus phenobarbitone monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.卡马西平与苯巴比妥单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:一项个体参与者数据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 15;12(12):CD001904. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001904.pub3.
8
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.癫痫的抗癫痫药物单药治疗:个体参与者数据的网状荟萃分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub3.
9
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.癫痫的抗癫痫药物单药治疗:个体参与者数据的网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 29;6(6):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub2.
10
Carbamazepine versus phenobarbitone monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.卡马西平与苯巴比妥单药治疗癫痫:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 23(7):CD001904. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001904.pub2.