Department of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuannanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Mar;38(3):1499-1511. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10586-w. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
The personalized treatments of T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial. We compared the long-term outcomes of T1 CRC patients after endoscopic resection (ER) and surgery, and evaluated the risk factors for the long-term prognosis.
T1 CRCs after resection at the Cancer Hospital, Chines Academy of Medical Sciences from June 2011 to November 2021 were reviewed. High-risk factors included positive resection margin, poor differentiation, deep submucosal invasion (DSI ≥ 1000 μm), lymphovascular invasion and intermediate/high tumor budding. Comparative analyses were conducted based on three treatment methods: follow-up after ER (Group A), additional surgery after ER (Group B) and initial surgery (Group C). The primary endpoints included recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazard regression models were constructed to identify risk factors for RFS and OS.
A total of 528 patients were enrolled (173 patients in Group A, 102 patients in Group B, 253 patients in Group C). The 3-year RFS, 5-year RFS, 3-year OS, and 5-year OS rates were 96.7%, 94.7%, 99.1%, and 97.8%, respectively. In the absence of other high-risk factors, RFS (P = 0.321) and OS (P = 0.155) of patients with DSI after ER were not inferior to those after surgery. Multivariate analyses identified sex (HR 0.379; 95% CI 0.160-0.894), Charlson comorbidities index (CCI) (HR 3.330; 95% CI 1.571-7.062), margin (HR 8.212; 95% CI 2.325-29.006), and budding (HR 3.794; 95% CI 1.686-8.541) as independent predictive factors of RFS, and identified CCI (HR 10.266; 95% CI 2.856-36.899) as an independent predictive factor of OS.
The long-term outcomes of ER are comparable to those of surgery in T1 CRC patients with DSI when other high-risk factors are negative. Resection margin, tumor budding, sex, and CCI may be the most important long-term prognostic factors for T1 CRC patients.
T1 结直肠癌(CRC)的个体化治疗仍存在争议。我们比较了内镜切除(ER)和手术治疗后 T1 CRC 患者的长期结局,并评估了长期预后的危险因素。
回顾了中国医学科学院肿瘤医院 2011 年 6 月至 2021 年 11 月切除的 T1 CRC 患者。高危因素包括切缘阳性、分化差、深黏膜下浸润(DSI≥1000μm)、脉管侵犯和中/高肿瘤芽生。根据三种治疗方法进行了对比分析:ER 后随访(A 组)、ER 后追加手术(B 组)和初始手术(C 组)。主要终点包括无复发生存率(RFS)和总生存率(OS)。Cox 比例风险回归模型用于识别 RFS 和 OS 的危险因素。
共纳入 528 例患者(A 组 173 例,B 组 102 例,C 组 253 例)。3 年 RFS、5 年 RFS、3 年 OS 和 5 年 OS 率分别为 96.7%、94.7%、99.1%和 97.8%。在没有其他高危因素的情况下,ER 后 DSI 患者的 RFS(P=0.321)和 OS(P=0.155)并不逊于手术后患者。多因素分析确定了性别(HR 0.379;95%CI 0.160-0.894)、Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)(HR 3.330;95%CI 1.571-7.062)、切缘(HR 8.212;95%CI 2.325-29.006)和芽生(HR 3.794;95%CI 1.686-8.541)是 RFS 的独立预测因素,CCI(HR 10.266;95%CI 2.856-36.899)是 OS 的独立预测因素。
在没有其他高危因素的情况下,T1 CRC 患者 DSI 时 ER 的长期结局与手术相当。切缘、肿瘤芽生、性别和 CCI 可能是 T1 CRC 患者最重要的长期预后因素。