Department of Pharmacy, Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2024 Sep;58(9):877-885. doi: 10.1177/10600280231221241. Epub 2024 Jan 21.
Phenobarbital may offer advantages over benzodiazepines for severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome (SAWS), but its impact on clinical outcomes has not been fully elucidated.
The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical impact of phenobarbital versus benzodiazepines for SAWS.
This retrospective cohort study compared phenobarbital to benzodiazepines for the management of SAWS for patients admitted to progressive or intensive care units (ICUs) between July 2018 and July 2022. Patients included had a history of delirium tremens (DT) or seizures, Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol-Revised (CIWA-Ar) >15, or Prediction of Alcohol Withdrawal Severity Scale (PAWSS) score ≥4. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included progressive or ICU LOS, incidence of adjunctive pharmacotherapy, and incidence/duration of mechanical ventilation.
The final analysis included 126 phenobarbital and 98 benzodiazepine encounters. Patients treated with phenobarbital had shorter median hospital LOS versus those treated with benzodiazepines (2.8 vs 4.7 days; < 0.0001); a finding corroborated by multivariable analysis. The phenobarbital group also had shorter median progressive/ICU LOS (0.7 vs 1.3 days; < 0.0001), and lower incidence of dexmedetomidine ( < 0.0001) and antipsychotic initiation ( < 0.0001). Fewer patients in the phenobarbital group compared to the benzodiazepine group received new mechanical ventilation ( = 0.045), but median duration was similar (1.2 vs 1.6 days; = 1.00).
Scheduled phenobarbital was associated with decreased hospital LOS compared to benzodiazepines for SAWS. This was the first study to compare outcomes of fixed-dose, nonoverlapping phenobarbital to benzodiazepines in patients with clearly defined SAWS and details a readily implementable protocol.
苯巴比妥在治疗严重酒精戒断综合征(SAWS)方面可能优于苯二氮䓬类药物,但它对临床结局的影响尚未完全阐明。
本研究旨在确定苯巴比妥与苯二氮䓬类药物治疗 SAWS 的临床效果。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,比较了 2018 年 7 月至 2022 年 7 月期间入住普通或重症监护病房(ICU)的患者使用苯巴比妥与苯二氮䓬类药物治疗 SAWS 的情况。纳入标准为:有震颤谵妄(DT)或癫痫病史,修订后的临床戒断评估酒精量表(CIWA-Ar)评分>15 分,或酒精戒断严重程度预测量表(PAWSS)评分≥4 分。主要结局为住院时间(LOS)。次要结局包括普通病房/ICU LOS、辅助药物治疗的发生率以及机械通气的发生率/持续时间。
最终分析包括 126 例苯巴比妥和 98 例苯二氮䓬类药物治疗的患者。与苯二氮䓬类药物治疗的患者相比,接受苯巴比妥治疗的患者中位 LOS 更短(2.8 天 vs 4.7 天;<0.0001);多变量分析结果一致。苯巴比妥组 ICU 或普通病房 LOS 更短(0.7 天 vs 1.3 天;<0.0001),右美托咪定(<0.0001)和抗精神病药起始使用(<0.0001)的发生率更低。与苯二氮䓬类药物相比,接受苯巴比妥治疗的患者中需要新机械通气的患者更少(=0.045),但机械通气的中位持续时间相似(1.2 天 vs 1.6 天;=1.00)。
与苯二氮䓬类药物相比,SAWS 患者接受苯巴比妥治疗与住院 LOS 缩短相关。这是第一项比较明确界定的 SAWS 患者使用固定剂量、不重叠的苯巴比妥与苯二氮䓬类药物的治疗结局的研究,并详细介绍了一种易于实施的方案。