The Key Laboratory of Aquatic Biodiversity and Conservation of Chinese Academy of Science, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, People's Republic of China.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0088, USA.
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Jan 31;291(2015):20232436. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2436. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
Two major types of species richness patterns are spatial (e.g. the latitudinal diversity gradient) and clade-based (e.g. the dominance of angiosperms among plants). Studies have debated whether clade-based richness patterns are explained primarily by larger clades having faster rates of species accumulation (speciation minus extinction over time; diversification-rate hypothesis) or by simply being older (clade-age hypothesis). However, these studies typically compared named clades of the same taxonomic rank, such as phyla and families. This study design is potentially biased against the clade-age hypothesis, since clades of the same rank may be more similar in age than randomly selected clades. Here, we analyse the causes of clade-based richness patterns across the tree of life using a large-scale, time-calibrated, species-level phylogeny and random sampling of clades. We find that within major groups of organisms (animals, plants, fungi, bacteria, archaeans), richness patterns are most strongly related to clade age. Nevertheless, weaker relationships with diversification rates are present in animals and plants. These overall results contrast with similar large-scale analyses across life based on named clades, which showed little effect of clade age on richness. More broadly, these results help support the overall importance of time for explaining diverse types of species richness patterns.
两种主要的物种丰富度模式是空间(例如,纬度多样性梯度)和基于分支的(例如,被子植物在植物中的优势)。研究一直存在争议,即基于分支的丰富度模式是否主要是由更大的分支具有更快的物种积累速度(随着时间的推移,物种形成减去灭绝;多样化率假说)或仅仅是因为更古老(分支年龄假说)来解释。然而,这些研究通常比较了同一分类等级的命名分支,例如门和科。这种研究设计可能不利于分支年龄假说,因为同一等级的分支在年龄上可能比随机选择的分支更相似。在这里,我们使用大规模、时间校准、基于物种的系统发育和分支的随机抽样来分析整个生命之树中基于分支的丰富度模式的原因。我们发现,在主要的生物体群体(动物、植物、真菌、细菌、古菌)中,丰富度模式与分支年龄最密切相关。然而,在动物和植物中,与多样化速度的关系较弱。这些总体结果与基于命名分支的生命中类似的大规模分析形成对比,后者表明分支年龄对丰富度的影响很小。更广泛地说,这些结果有助于支持时间对于解释不同类型的物种丰富度模式的总体重要性。