Suppr超能文献

理解影响全球控制性传播感染政策优先级的因素:一项定性政策分析。

Understanding the factors affecting global political priority for controlling sexually transmitted infections: a qualitative policy analysis.

机构信息

Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, China.

Center for World Health Organization Studies, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Jan 23;9(1):e014237. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014237.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a significant public health challenge, but there is a perceived lack of political priority in addressing STIs as a global health issue. Our study aimed to understand the determinants of global political priority for STIs since the 1980s and to discern implications for future prioritisation.

METHODS

Through semistructured interviews from July 2021 to February 2022, we engaged 20 key stakeholders (8 women, 12 men) from academia, United Nations agencies, international non-governmental organisations, philanthropic organisations and national public health agencies. A published policy framework was employed for thematic analysis, and findings triangulated with relevant literature and policy documents. We examined issue characteristics, prevailing ideas, actor power dynamics and political contexts.

RESULTS

A contrast in perspectives before and after the year 2000 emerged. STI control was high on the global health agenda during the late 1980s and 1990s, as a means to control HIV. A strong policy community agreed on evidence about the high burden of STIs and that STI management could reduce the incidence of HIV. The level of importance decreased when further research evidence did not find an impact of STI control interventions on HIV incidence. Since 2000, cohesion in the STI community has decreased. New framing for broad STI control has not emerged. Interventions that have been funded, such as human papillomavirus vaccination and congenital syphilis elimination have been framed as cancer control or improving newborn survival, rather than as STI control.

CONCLUSION

Globally, the perceived decline in STI control priority might stem from discrepancies between investment choices and experts' views on STI priorities. Addressing STIs requires understanding the intertwined nature of politics and empirical evidence in resource allocation. The ascent of universal health coverage presents an opportunity for integrated STI strategies but high-quality care, sustainable funding and strategic coordination are essential.

摘要

简介

性传播感染(STIs)是一个重大的公共卫生挑战,但人们认为,作为一个全球卫生问题,性传播感染在政治上没有得到足够的重视。我们的研究旨在了解自 20 世纪 80 年代以来全球对性传播感染的政治优先事项的决定因素,并探讨对未来优先事项的影响。

方法

通过 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 2 月的半结构式访谈,我们邀请了来自学术界、联合国机构、国际非政府组织、慈善组织和国家公共卫生机构的 20 名关键利益相关者(8 名女性,12 名男性)参与。采用已发表的政策框架进行主题分析,并将调查结果与相关文献和政策文件进行三角分析。我们研究了问题的特征、流行的观点、行为体的权力动态和政治背景。

结果

2000 年前后出现了观点的对比。在 20 世纪 80 年代末和 90 年代,性传播感染控制作为控制 HIV 的一种手段,在全球卫生议程上占据了重要地位。一个强大的政策界就性传播感染的高负担以及性传播感染管理可以降低 HIV 发病率的证据达成了一致意见。当进一步的研究证据没有发现性传播感染控制干预对 HIV 发病率的影响时,重要性的程度就降低了。自 2000 年以来,性传播感染界的凝聚力有所下降。新的广泛的性传播感染控制框架尚未出现。已经得到资金支持的干预措施,如人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种和先天性梅毒消除,被框定为癌症控制或改善新生儿生存,而不是性传播感染控制。

结论

在全球范围内,性传播感染控制优先事项的感知下降可能源于投资选择与专家对性传播感染优先事项的看法之间的差异。解决性传播感染问题需要理解政治和资源分配中实证证据的交织性质。全民健康覆盖的兴起为综合的性传播感染战略提供了机会,但高质量的护理、可持续的资金和战略协调是必不可少的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2680/10823925/c99a32e19818/bmjgh-2023-014237f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验