Suppr超能文献

伊达比星、卡非佐米和 CD38 单克隆抗体 idecabtagene vicleucel 治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的疗效和安全性:一项真实世界多中心研究。

Efficacy and safety of idecabtagene vicleucel in patients with relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma not meeting the KarMMa-1 trial eligibility criteria: A real-world multicentre study.

机构信息

US Myeloma Innovations Research Collaborative (USMIRC), Kansas City, Kansas, USA.

Department of Hematology-Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Br J Haematol. 2024 Apr;204(4):1293-1299. doi: 10.1111/bjh.19302. Epub 2024 Jan 23.

Abstract

Ide-cel received approval for relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma based on the results of the KarMMa-1 trial. However, patients with significant comorbidities, aggressive disease and prior B-cell maturation antigen-directed therapy (BCMA-DT) were excluded. This retrospective study evaluated real-world outcomes of patients who did not meet the KarMMa-1 eligibility criteria and were treated with standard of care (SOC) ide-cel. A total of 69 patients from three US centres who did not meet the KarMMa-1 criteria underwent ide-cel infusion. The main reasons for trial ineligibility included baseline grade 3-4 cytopenia (39%), prior BCMA-DT (26%), renal impairment (19%) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2 (14.5%). Cytokine-release syndrome occurred in 81% vs. 84%, and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurred in 28% vs. 18% of SOC versus KarMMa-1 patients, respectively. Early infection (≤8 weeks post-infusion) and severe infection rates were 42% vs. 49% and 30% vs. 22% for the SOC versus KarMMa-1 cohorts, respectively. Grade 3-4 cytopenias for SOC versus KarMMa-1 cohorts were: neutropenia (87% vs. 89%), anaemia (51% vs. 60%) and thrombocytopenia (65% vs. 52%). Overall response rate was higher for the SOC cohort (93% vs. 73%), as was the complete response or better rate (48% vs. 33%). However, median progression-free survival and overall survival were comparable between the two groups. Our findings support broadening the inclusion criteria of future trials evaluating ide-cel.

摘要

依鲁替尼细胞疗法基于 KarMMa-1 试验的结果被批准用于治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤。然而,该试验排除了患有严重合并症、侵袭性疾病和既往 B 细胞成熟抗原导向治疗(BCMA-DT)的患者。这项回顾性研究评估了不符合 KarMMa-1 入选标准且接受标准治疗(SOC)依鲁替尼细胞疗法的患者的真实世界结局。来自美国三个中心的 69 名不符合 KarMMa-1 标准的患者接受了依鲁替尼细胞输注。试验不合格的主要原因包括基线 3-4 级细胞减少症(39%)、既往 BCMA-DT(26%)、肾功能损害(19%)和东部肿瘤协作组表现状态≥2(14.5%)。分别有 81%和 84%的 SOC 组和 KarMMa-1 组发生细胞因子释放综合征,28%和 18%的 SOC 组和 KarMMa-1 组发生免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征。早期感染(输注后≤8 周)和严重感染的发生率分别为 SOC 组和 KarMMa-1 组的 42%和 49%,30%和 22%。SOC 组与 KarMMa-1 组的 3-4 级细胞减少症分别为:中性粒细胞减少症(87%和 89%)、贫血(51%和 60%)和血小板减少症(65%和 52%)。SOC 组的总缓解率更高(93%比 73%),完全缓解或更好的缓解率也更高(48%比 33%)。然而,两组之间的无进展生存期和总生存期无差异。我们的研究结果支持扩大未来评估依鲁替尼细胞疗法的试验的纳入标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验