Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, USA.
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, USA; Department of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, USA.
Ann Epidemiol. 2024 Mar;91:30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2024.01.007. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
To estimate associations between facets of the maternal childhood family environment with gestational diabetes (GDM) and to test mediation by pre-pregnancy waist circumference.
We used data from CARDIA, a cohort of individuals aged 18-30 years at baseline (1985-86), followed over 30 years (2016). We included participants with one or more pregnancies ≥ 20 weeks after baseline, without pre-pregnancy diabetes. The primary exposure was the Childhood Family Environment Scale (assessed year 15), including the total score and abuse, nurture, and stability subscales as continuous, separate exposures. The outcome was GDM (self-reported at each visit for each pregnancy). We fit log binomial models with generalized estimating equations to calculate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for age at delivery, parity, race (Black or White), and parental education. We used regression models with bootstrapped CIs to test mediation and effect modification by excess abdominal adiposity at the last preconception CARDIA visit (waist circumference ≥ 88 cm).
We included 1033 individuals (46% Black) with 1836 pregnancies. 130 pregnancies (7.1%) were complicated by GDM. For each 1 point increase on the abuse subscale (e.g., from "rarely or never" to "some or little of the time") there was a 30% increased risk of GDM (RR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.0, 1.7). There was evidence of effect modification but not mediation by preconception abdominal adiposity.
A more adverse childhood family environment was associated with increased risk of GDM, with a stronger association among individuals with preconception waist circumference ≥ 88 cm.
本研究旨在评估母体儿童期家庭环境的各个方面与妊娠糖尿病(GDM)的关联,并检验孕前腰围对其的中介作用。
我们使用了 CARDIA 队列的数据,该队列的参与者在基线(1985-1986 年)时年龄在 18-30 岁之间,随访时间超过 30 年(2016 年)。我们纳入了至少有一次孕 20 周以上的基线后妊娠且无孕前糖尿病的参与者。主要暴露因素是儿童期家庭环境量表(在第 15 年评估),包括总分和虐待、养育和稳定性子量表,作为连续、独立的暴露因素。结局是 GDM(在每次妊娠的每次就诊时自我报告)。我们使用广义估计方程的对数二项式模型来计算风险比(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI),并调整分娩年龄、产次、种族(黑人或白人)和父母教育水平。我们使用带有 bootstrap CI 的回归模型来检验最后一次 CARDIA 孕前就诊时腹部肥胖过多(腰围≥88cm)的中介作用和修饰作用。
我们纳入了 1033 名参与者(46%为黑人),其中有 1836 次妊娠。130 次妊娠(7.1%)并发 GDM。虐待子量表每增加 1 分(例如,从“很少或从不”到“有时或有点”),GDM 的风险增加 30%(RR:1.3,95%CI:1.0,1.7)。存在修饰作用,但没有中介作用。
更恶劣的儿童期家庭环境与 GDM 风险增加相关,而在孕前腰围≥88cm 的个体中相关性更强。