Suppr超能文献

达芬奇手术机器人对临床环境中电磁跟踪的影响。

The influence of the da Vinci surgical robot on electromagnetic tracking in a clinical environment.

作者信息

Aguilera Saiz L, Groen H C, Heerink W J, Ruers T J M

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Faculty of Science and Technology (TNW), Nanobiophysics Group (NBP), University of Twente, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2024 Jan 27;18(1):54. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01812-7.

Abstract

Robot-assisted surgery is increasingly used in surgery for cancer. Reduced overview and loss of anatomical orientation are challenges that might be solved with image-guided surgical navigation using electromagnetic tracking (EMT). However, the robot's presence may distort the electromagnetic field, affecting EMT accuracy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the robot's influence on EMT accuracy. For this purpose, two different electromagnetic field generators were used inside a clinical surgical environment: a table top field generator (TTFG) and a planar field generator (PFG). The position and orientation of sensors within the electromagnetic field were measured using an accurate in-house developed 3D board. Baseline accuracy was measured without the robot, followed by stepwise introduction of potential distortion sources (robot and robotic instruments). The absolute accuracy was determined within the entire 3D board and in the clinical working volume. For the baseline setup, median errors in the entire tracking volume within the 3D board were 0.9 mm and 0.3° (TTFG), and 1.1 mm and 0.4° (PFG). Adding the robot and instruments did not affect the TTFG's position accuracy (p = 0.60), while the PFG's accuracies decreased to 1.5 mm and 0.7° (p < 0.001). For both field generators, when adding robot and instruments, accuracies inside the clinical working volume were higher compared to the entire tracking 3D board volume, 0.7 mm and 0.3° (TTFG), and 1.1 mm and 0.7° (PFG). Introduction of a surgical robot and robotic instruments shows limited distortion of the EMT field, allowing sufficient accuracy for surgical navigation in robotic procedures.

摘要

机器人辅助手术在癌症手术中的应用日益广泛。视野受限和解剖定位丧失是一些挑战,而使用电磁跟踪(EMT)的图像引导手术导航可能会解决这些问题。然而,机器人的存在可能会使电磁场失真,影响EMT的准确性。本研究的目的是评估机器人对EMT准确性的影响。为此,在临床手术环境中使用了两种不同的电磁场发生器:桌面场发生器(TTFG)和平面场发生器(PFG)。使用精确的内部开发的3D板测量电磁场中传感器的位置和方向。在没有机器人的情况下测量基线准确性,然后逐步引入潜在的失真源(机器人和机器人器械)。在整个3D板和临床工作空间内确定绝对准确性。对于基线设置,3D板内整个跟踪体积的中位误差为0.9毫米和0.3°(TTFG),以及1.1毫米和0.4°(PFG)。添加机器人和器械不会影响TTFG的位置准确性(p = 0.60),而PFG的准确性降至1.5毫米和0.7°(p < 0.001)。对于这两种场发生器,添加机器人和器械后,临床工作空间内的准确性高于整个跟踪3D板体积,分别为0.7毫米和0.3°(TTFG),以及1.1毫米和0.7°(PFG)。引入手术机器人和机器人器械显示EMT场的失真有限,可为机器人手术中的手术导航提供足够的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6a/10821979/9b53819dfd39/11701_2023_1812_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验