Departments of Biology, Barnard College, Columbia University, 3009 Broadway, New York, NY 10027, USA; Neuroscience & Behavior, Barnard College, Columbia University, 3009 Broadway, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Departments of Biology, Barnard College, Columbia University, 3009 Broadway, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Physiol Behav. 2024 Mar 15;276:114476. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114476. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
Oral stimulation by glucose triggers a rapid insulin response, which enhances glucose tolerance. This so-called cephalic-phase insulin response (CPIR) has been documented in many mammal species, but its functional properties are poorly characterized. Here, we studied CPIR in lean C57BL/6 mice. Experiment 1 asked whether the large individual differences in CPIR magnitude were real or reflected experimental noise. We measured CPIR magnitude four times across a period of 30 days in the same mice. The individual differences in CPIR magnitude were remarkably stable across the repeated trials, indicating that they were real. Experiment 2 examined the functional consequences of individual differences in CPIR magnitude. We found that higher CPIR magnitudes contributed to larger postprandial insulin responses and greater glucose tolerance. Experiment 3 examined the observation that the CPIRs in Experiments 1 and 2 were associated with a rapid rise in blood glucose. To determine whether the rapid rise in blood glucose caused the CPIRs, we asked whether mice would generate a CPIR if we prevented cephalic-phase stimulation of beta cells by either delivering the glucose intragastrically or blocking parasympathetic input to the pancreatic beta cells with atropine. The mice subjected to these treatments experienced a rapid rise in blood glucose, but they did not exhibit a CPIR. This indicates that it was the oral glucose stimulation, and not the rise in blood glucose, that triggered the CPIRs in Experiments 1 and 2. We conclude that (i) individual differences in CPIR magnitude are stable over time; (ii) CPIR magnitudes predicted postprandial insulin responses and glucose tolerance; and (iii) a rapid rise in blood glucose is not sufficient to trigger a CPIR in mice.
口腔刺激葡萄糖会引发快速的胰岛素反应,从而增强葡萄糖耐量。这种所谓的头相胰岛素反应(CPIR)已在许多哺乳动物物种中得到证实,但它的功能特性尚未得到很好的描述。在这里,我们研究了瘦型 C57BL/6 小鼠中的 CPIR。实验 1 询问 CPIR 幅度的个体差异是否真实存在,还是反映了实验噪声。我们在 30 天的时间内,在同一只小鼠中四次测量 CPIR 幅度。CPIR 幅度的个体差异在重复试验中表现出惊人的稳定性,表明它们是真实存在的。实验 2 研究了 CPIR 幅度个体差异的功能后果。我们发现,较高的 CPIR 幅度有助于更大的餐后胰岛素反应和更好的葡萄糖耐量。实验 3 检验了 CPIR 在实验 1 和 2 中与血糖快速上升相关的观察结果。为了确定血糖的快速上升是否导致了 CPIR,我们询问是否通过将葡萄糖经胃内给予或用阿托品阻断胰腺β细胞的副交感神经输入来阻止头相刺激β细胞,小鼠是否会产生 CPIR。接受这些处理的小鼠血糖迅速升高,但它们没有表现出 CPIR。这表明是口腔葡萄糖刺激,而不是血糖升高,引发了实验 1 和 2 中的 CPIR。我们得出结论:(i)CPIR 幅度的个体差异随时间稳定;(ii)CPIR 幅度预测餐后胰岛素反应和葡萄糖耐量;(iii)血糖的快速上升不足以在小鼠中引发 CPIR。