Suppr超能文献

个体间的头相胰岛素反应差异具有时间稳定性,并可预测小鼠的葡萄糖耐量。

Individual differences in cephalic-phase insulin response are stable over time and predict glucose tolerance in mice.

机构信息

Departments of Biology, Barnard College, Columbia University, 3009 Broadway, New York, NY 10027, USA; Neuroscience & Behavior, Barnard College, Columbia University, 3009 Broadway, New York, NY 10027, USA.

Departments of Biology, Barnard College, Columbia University, 3009 Broadway, New York, NY 10027, USA.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 2024 Mar 15;276:114476. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114476. Epub 2024 Jan 26.

Abstract

Oral stimulation by glucose triggers a rapid insulin response, which enhances glucose tolerance. This so-called cephalic-phase insulin response (CPIR) has been documented in many mammal species, but its functional properties are poorly characterized. Here, we studied CPIR in lean C57BL/6 mice. Experiment 1 asked whether the large individual differences in CPIR magnitude were real or reflected experimental noise. We measured CPIR magnitude four times across a period of 30 days in the same mice. The individual differences in CPIR magnitude were remarkably stable across the repeated trials, indicating that they were real. Experiment 2 examined the functional consequences of individual differences in CPIR magnitude. We found that higher CPIR magnitudes contributed to larger postprandial insulin responses and greater glucose tolerance. Experiment 3 examined the observation that the CPIRs in Experiments 1 and 2 were associated with a rapid rise in blood glucose. To determine whether the rapid rise in blood glucose caused the CPIRs, we asked whether mice would generate a CPIR if we prevented cephalic-phase stimulation of beta cells by either delivering the glucose intragastrically or blocking parasympathetic input to the pancreatic beta cells with atropine. The mice subjected to these treatments experienced a rapid rise in blood glucose, but they did not exhibit a CPIR. This indicates that it was the oral glucose stimulation, and not the rise in blood glucose, that triggered the CPIRs in Experiments 1 and 2. We conclude that (i) individual differences in CPIR magnitude are stable over time; (ii) CPIR magnitudes predicted postprandial insulin responses and glucose tolerance; and (iii) a rapid rise in blood glucose is not sufficient to trigger a CPIR in mice.

摘要

口腔刺激葡萄糖会引发快速的胰岛素反应,从而增强葡萄糖耐量。这种所谓的头相胰岛素反应(CPIR)已在许多哺乳动物物种中得到证实,但它的功能特性尚未得到很好的描述。在这里,我们研究了瘦型 C57BL/6 小鼠中的 CPIR。实验 1 询问 CPIR 幅度的个体差异是否真实存在,还是反映了实验噪声。我们在 30 天的时间内,在同一只小鼠中四次测量 CPIR 幅度。CPIR 幅度的个体差异在重复试验中表现出惊人的稳定性,表明它们是真实存在的。实验 2 研究了 CPIR 幅度个体差异的功能后果。我们发现,较高的 CPIR 幅度有助于更大的餐后胰岛素反应和更好的葡萄糖耐量。实验 3 检验了 CPIR 在实验 1 和 2 中与血糖快速上升相关的观察结果。为了确定血糖的快速上升是否导致了 CPIR,我们询问是否通过将葡萄糖经胃内给予或用阿托品阻断胰腺β细胞的副交感神经输入来阻止头相刺激β细胞,小鼠是否会产生 CPIR。接受这些处理的小鼠血糖迅速升高,但它们没有表现出 CPIR。这表明是口腔葡萄糖刺激,而不是血糖升高,引发了实验 1 和 2 中的 CPIR。我们得出结论:(i)CPIR 幅度的个体差异随时间稳定;(ii)CPIR 幅度预测餐后胰岛素反应和葡萄糖耐量;(iii)血糖的快速上升不足以在小鼠中引发 CPIR。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验