Intermountain Health, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Intermountain Health, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 Apr;30(4):438.e1-438.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.01.076. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
The optimal timing of immunosuppression and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) is unknown. However, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) following haplo-HSCT is associated with worse transplantation outcomes, and the incidence of CRS may be affected by the timing of immunosuppression and PTCy. In this study, we compared CRS and other transplantation outcomes in 2 cohorts receiving different immunosuppression and PTCy schedules following haplo-HSCT. This was a retrospective cohort study of 91 patients who underwent haplo-HSCT at the Intermountain Health Blood and Marrow Transplant Program. The original or standard haplo-HSCT GVHD prophylaxis regimen included PTCy on days +3 and +4, with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and tacrolimus starting on day +5. The modified regimen adopted in November 2020 changed PTCy to days +3 and +5, with earlier introduction of tacrolimus and MMF, on day -1 and day 0, respectively. Grade ≥1 CRS occurred in 32% of patients in the modified regimen, in 82% of patients in the standard regimen (P <.0001), and 65% overall. Likewise, grade ≥2 CRS was lower with the modified regimen (16% versus 57%; P = .0002). The mean duration of CRS symptoms was longer with the standard regimen (3.14 days versus 1.44 days; P = .0003). The incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease grade III-IV or extensive chronic GVHD (cGVHD) at 1 year was lower in the modified regimen (6% versus 32%; P = .0068). No differences between the standard and modified regimens were seen in overall survival, relapse, or GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS), although there appeared to be a trend toward improved GRFS with the modified regimen. Post hoc analysis comparing GRFS in patients with CRS and those without CRS found that CRS was associated with lower GRFS at 1 year (36% versus 63%; P = .0138). The duration of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy was decreased by 7.5 days (P = .0017) and the time to hospital discharge was reduced by 7.1 days (P = .0241) with the modified regimen. This is the first analysis to evaluate and find a difference in CRS with early initiation of immunosuppressive therapy in haplo-HSCT. Our results suggest that this modified GVHD regimen benefits patients by reducing CRS and high-grade GVHD compared to the standard PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis regimen in haplo-HSCT. Additionally, this novel regimen did not appear to negatively impact outcomes.
在单倍体造血干细胞移植(haplo-HSCT)中,免疫抑制和移植后环磷酰胺(PTCy)的最佳时机尚不清楚。然而,haplo-HSCT 后细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)与更差的移植结果相关,CRS 的发生率可能受免疫抑制和 PTCy 时机的影响。在这项研究中,我们比较了接受 haplo-HSCT 后接受不同免疫抑制和 PTCy 方案的 2 个队列中的 CRS 和其他移植结果。这是对在 Intermountain Health 血液和骨髓移植计划接受 haplo-HSCT 的 91 名患者进行的回顾性队列研究。原始或标准的 haplo-HSCT GVHD 预防方案包括在第 +3 天和第 +4 天使用 PTCy,在第 +5 天开始使用吗替麦考酚酯(MMF)和他克莫司。2020 年 11 月采用的改良方案将 PTCy 改为第 +3 天和第 +5 天,分别在第-1 天和第 0 天更早地引入他克莫司和 MMF。改良方案中 32%的患者发生了 1 级及以上 CRS,标准方案中 82%的患者(P<0.0001)和 65%的患者发生了 CRS。同样,改良方案中 2 级及以上 CRS 发生率较低(16%比 57%;P=0.0002)。标准方案中 CRS 症状的持续时间较长(3.14 天比 1.44 天;P=0.0003)。改良方案中 1 年时急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)III-IV 级或广泛慢性 GVHD(cGVHD)的发生率较低(6%比 32%;P=0.0068)。标准和改良方案在总生存率、复发或无 GVHD 复发(GRFS)方面无差异,尽管改良方案似乎有改善 GRFS 的趋势。对 CRS 患者和无 CRS 患者的 GRFS 进行事后分析发现,CRS 与 1 年时较低的 GRFS 相关(36%比 63%;P=0.0138)。改良方案使广谱抗生素治疗时间缩短 7.5 天(P=0.0017),住院时间缩短 7.1 天(P=0.0241)。这是第一项评估和发现单倍体 HSCT 中早期开始免疫抑制治疗与 CRS 差异的分析。我们的结果表明,与基于 PTCy 的标准 GVHD 预防方案相比,这种改良的 GVHD 方案通过降低 CRS 和高级别 GVHD 使患者受益。此外,这种新方案似乎没有对结果产生负面影响。