Culmer Nathan P, Smith Todd Brenton, Berryhill M Blake, Gurenlian JoAnn, Simpson Lance, Ogden Shawnna, Parrish Jonathan, Ryan Lacey, White Nicole, Bettis Merrill, Greenwood Charlotte
College of Community Health Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA.
Capstone College of Nursing, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2024 Apr;88(4):445-460. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13444. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
The purpose of this study was to conduct a scoping review to examine and summarize the characteristics of research related to mental health (MH) screenings and/or referrals to treatment in dental practices.
We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for Scoping Reviews and searched multiple databases for terms connected with dental care, MH concerns, screening, and referral. Included articles: (1) described care provided in a dental practice, (2) described a situation where the patient is experiencing the potential MH problem, (3) did not involve dental anxiety exclusively, and (4) involved some form of MH screening and/or referral to treatment. Article analysis included a summary of key study characteristics, types of evidence, study design, and central concepts and definitions.
The search generated 2050 records, with 26 ultimately included. Most studies involved only adults (22, 85%), but only three (12%) reported on rurality (two urban; one mixed) and only two each (8%) reported race or ethnicity. Fifteen (58%) articles were prospective and 11 (42%) were retrospective. The studies varied widely in study designs, from 11 (42%) cross-sectional methodologies to only one (4%) randomized controlled trial. Thirty-four screening tools were used to screen for symptoms of 43 MH conditions, with depression and anxiety screened for most frequently. Few articles discussed making referrals, practice workflows, or follow-up outcomes.
Included studies provide evidence of viable options for dental practitioners regarding MH screening, referring, and conducting follow-up, but lack specificity regarding these processes. Overall, more research is needed to clarify what workflows are most efficient for dental practitioners and efficacious in identifying patients with MH concerns.
本研究旨在进行一项范围综述,以检查和总结牙科诊所中与心理健康(MH)筛查和/或转诊治疗相关的研究特征。
我们遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目范围综述指南,在多个数据库中搜索与牙科护理、MH问题、筛查和转诊相关的术语。纳入的文章:(1)描述了牙科诊所提供的护理,(2)描述了患者经历潜在MH问题的情况,(3)不专门涉及牙科焦虑,(4)涉及某种形式的MH筛查和/或转诊治疗。文章分析包括关键研究特征、证据类型、研究设计以及核心概念和定义的总结。
检索产生了2050条记录,最终纳入26条。大多数研究仅涉及成年人(22项,85%),但只有三项(12%)报告了农村地区情况(两项城市;一项混合),各只有两项(8%)报告了种族或民族。15篇(58%)文章是前瞻性的,11篇(42%)是回顾性的。研究设计差异很大,从11项(42%)横断面方法到仅一项(4%)随机对照试验。使用了34种筛查工具来筛查43种MH状况的症状,其中抑郁和焦虑筛查最为频繁。很少有文章讨论转诊、实践工作流程或随访结果。
纳入的研究为牙科从业者在MH筛查、转诊和进行随访方面提供了可行选择的证据,但在这些过程方面缺乏特异性。总体而言,需要更多研究来阐明哪些工作流程对牙科从业者最有效,以及在识别有MH问题的患者方面最有效。