Hart Harvi F, Crossley Kay M, Culvenor Adam G, Khan Michaela C M, West Thomas J, Kennedy Joshua B, Couch Jamon L, Whittaker Jackie L
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2024 Apr;54(4):234-247. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2024.12070.
: To (1) compare activity-related psychological factors between individuals with and without knee conditions, and (2) assess associations between these factors and objective measures of function in individuals with knee conditions. : A priori registered systematic review with meta-analysis. : MEDLINE-Ovid, Embase-Ovid, Scopus-Elsevier, CINAHL-EBSCO, SPORTDiscus-EBSCO, and Cochrane Library were searched to May 27, 2022. : We included peer-reviewed primary data studies (observational and experimental) of human participants with and without knee conditions reporting knee confidence, fear of movement/avoidance beliefs, and/or psychological readiness to return to sport (RTS) or reporting correlations between these factors and objective measures of function in knee conditions. Where possible, data were pooled by knee conditions, otherwise performed narrative syntheses. The Downs and Black checklist assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. : Forty studies (3546 participants with knee conditions; 616 participants without knee conditions) were included. There was very low-certainty evidence of higher fear of movement in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41, 0.52), but not in individuals with patellofemoral pain (SMD, 0.66; 95% CI: -7.98, 9.29) when compared with those without knee conditions. There was very low-certainty evidence of no differences in psychological readiness to RTS after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (SMD, -1.14; 95% CI: -2.97, 0.70) compared to no knee condition, and negligible to weak positive correlations between psychological readiness to RTS and objective measures of function. There was very low-certainty evidence of higher fear of movement in individuals with knee osteoarthritis compared to those without, and very low-certainty evidence of no correlations between these factors and objective measures of function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. .
(1)比较有膝关节疾病和无膝关节疾病个体之间与活动相关的心理因素;(2)评估这些因素与膝关节疾病个体功能客观测量指标之间的关联。
预先注册的系统评价并进行荟萃分析。
检索MEDLINE-Ovid、Embase-Ovid、Scopus-Elsevier、CINAHL-EBSCO、SPORTDiscus-EBSCO和Cochrane图书馆,检索截至2022年5月27日的文献。
我们纳入了同行评审的关于有和无膝关节疾病的人类参与者的原始数据研究(观察性和实验性),这些研究报告了膝关节信心、运动恐惧/回避信念和/或恢复运动(RTS)的心理准备情况,或报告了这些因素与膝关节疾病功能客观测量指标之间的相关性。在可能的情况下,按膝关节疾病情况汇总数据,否则进行叙述性综合分析。采用唐斯和布莱克清单评估纳入研究的方法学质量。
纳入40项研究(3546名有膝关节疾病的参与者;616名无膝关节疾病的参与者)。与无膝关节疾病的个体相比,有膝关节骨关节炎的个体存在运动恐惧更高的证据,证据确定性极低(标准化均值差[SMD],0.46;95%置信区间[CI]:0.41,0.52),但髌股疼痛个体不存在(SMD,0.66;95%CI:-7.98,9.29)。与无膝关节疾病相比,前交叉韧带重建后恢复运动的心理准备情况无差异的证据确定性极低(SMD,-1.14;95%CI:-2.97,0.70),恢复运动的心理准备情况与功能客观测量指标之间的相关性可忽略不计至弱正相关。与无膝关节疾病的个体相比,有膝关节骨关节炎的个体存在运动恐惧更高的证据确定性极低,且在前交叉韧带重建后这些因素与功能客观测量指标之间无相关性的证据确定性极低。