Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General de Tomelloso, Tomelloso, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
United European Gastroenterol J. 2024 Jun;12(5):585-595. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12533. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
Swallowed topical corticosteroids (tC) are common therapy for patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Widely heterogeneous results have occurred due to their active ingredients, formulations and doses.
To assess the effectiveness of topical corticosteroid therapy for EoE in real-world practice.
Cross-sectional study analysis of the multicentre EoE CONNECT registry. Clinical remission was defined as a decrease of ≥50% in dysphagia symptom scores; histological remission was defined as a peak eosinophil count below 15 per high-power field. The effectiveness in achieving clinico-histological remission (CHR) was compared for the main tC formulations.
Overall, data on 1456 prescriptions of tC in monotherapy used in 866 individual patients were assessed. Of those, 904 prescriptions with data on formulation were employed for the induction of remission; 234 reduced a previously effective dose for maintenance. Fluticasone propionate formulations dominated the first-line treatment, while budesonide was more common in later therapies. A swallowed nasal drop suspension was the most common formulation of fluticasone propionate. Doses ≥0.8 mg/day provided a 65% CHR rate and were superior to lower doses. Oral viscous solution prepared by a pharmacist was the most common prescription of budesonide; 4 mg/day provided no benefit over 2 mg/day (CHR rated being 72% and 80%, respectively). A multivariate analysis revealed budesonide orodispersible tablets as the most effective therapy (OR 18.9, p < 0.001); use of higher doses (OR 4.3, p = 0.03) and lower symptom scores (OR 0.9, p = 0.01) were also determinants of effectiveness.
Reduced symptom severity, use of high doses, and use of budesonide orodispersible tablets particularly were all independent predictors of tC effectiveness.
口服皮质类固醇(tC)是治疗嗜酸性食管炎(EoE)患者的常用疗法。由于其活性成分、配方和剂量的广泛差异,导致结果存在很大差异。
评估真实世界实践中局部皮质类固醇治疗 EoE 的效果。
对多中心 EoE CONNECT 登记处进行的横断面研究分析。临床缓解定义为吞咽困难症状评分降低≥50%;组织学缓解定义为高倍视野下嗜酸性粒细胞计数低于 15 个。比较了主要 tC 制剂在实现临床组织学缓解(CHR)方面的效果。
总体而言,评估了 866 名患者中 1456 例 tC 单药治疗的处方数据。其中,904 例处方提供了制剂数据,用于诱导缓解;234 例用于维持缓解的先前有效剂量。丙酸氟替卡松制剂在一线治疗中占主导地位,而布地奈德在后期治疗中更为常见。吸入鼻腔滴剂混悬液是丙酸氟替卡松最常见的制剂。剂量≥0.8mg/天提供 65%的 CHR 率,优于低剂量。由药剂师制备的口服粘性溶液是布地奈德最常见的处方;4mg/天与 2mg/天相比没有获益(CHR 率分别为 72%和 80%)。多变量分析显示布地奈德口崩片是最有效的治疗方法(OR 18.9,p<0.001);使用更高剂量(OR 4.3,p=0.03)和更低的症状评分(OR 0.9,p=0.01)也是有效性的决定因素。
减轻症状严重程度、使用高剂量以及使用布地奈德口崩片特别能预测 tC 的有效性。