Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
CoNISMa, Rome, Italy.
Ecology. 2024 Mar;105(3):e4246. doi: 10.1002/ecy.4246. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
Understanding how synchronous species fluctuations affect community stability is a main research topic in ecology. Yet experimental studies evaluating how changes in disturbance regimes affect the synchrony and stability of populations and communities remain rare. We hypothesized that spatially heterogeneous disturbances of moderate intensity would promote metacommunity stability by decreasing the spatial synchrony of species fluctuations. To test this hypothesis, we exposed rocky shore communities of algae and invertebrates to homogeneous and gradient-like spatial patterns of disturbance at two levels of intensity for 4 years and used synchrony networks to characterize community responses to these disturbances. The gradient-like disturbance at low intensity enhanced spatial β diversity compared to the other treatments and produced the most heterogeneous and least synchronized network, which was also the most stable in terms of population and community fluctuations. In contrast, homogeneous disturbance destabilized the community, enhancing spatial synchronization. Intense disturbances always reduced spatial β diversity, indicating that strong perturbations could destabilize communities via biotic homogenization regardless of their spatial structure. Our findings corroborated theoretical predictions, emphasizing the importance of spatially heterogeneous disturbances in promoting stability by amplifying asynchronous spatial and temporal fluctuations in population and community abundance. In contrast to other networks, synchrony networks are vulnerable to the removal of most peripheral nodes, which are less synchronized, but may contribute more to stability than other nodes by dampening large fluctuations in species abundance. Our findings suggest that climate change and direct anthropogenic disturbance can compromise the stability of ecological communities through combined effects on diversity and synchrony, as well as further affecting ecosystems through habitat loss.
理解同步物种波动如何影响群落稳定性是生态学的主要研究课题。然而,评估干扰制度变化如何影响种群和群落同步性和稳定性的实验研究仍然很少。我们假设,中等强度的空间异质干扰将通过降低物种波动的空间同步性来促进复合群稳定性。为了验证这一假设,我们将藻类和无脊椎动物的 rocky shore 群落暴露于两种强度水平的同质和梯度样空间干扰模式下 4 年,并使用同步网络来描述群落对这些干扰的响应。与其他处理相比,低强度的梯度样干扰增强了空间 β 多样性,并产生了最具异质性和最不同步的网络,就种群和群落波动而言,该网络也是最稳定的。相比之下,同质干扰使群落不稳定,增强了空间同步性。强烈的干扰总是降低空间 β 多样性,这表明强烈的干扰可能通过生物同质化使群落不稳定,而不论其空间结构如何。我们的发现证实了理论预测,强调了空间异质干扰通过放大种群和群落丰度的异步时空波动来促进稳定性的重要性。与其他网络不同,同步网络容易受到最外围节点的移除的影响,这些节点的同步性较低,但通过缓冲物种丰度的大波动,可能比其他节点对稳定性的贡献更大。我们的发现表明,气候变化和直接人为干扰可能会通过对多样性和同步性的综合影响,以及通过栖息地丧失进一步影响生态系统,从而破坏生态群落的稳定性。