Schäfer Ann-Britt, Sidarta Margareth, Abdelmesseh Nekhala Ireny, Marinho Righetto Gabriela, Arshad Aysha, Wenzel Michaela
Division of Chemical Biology, Department of Life Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Center for Antibiotic Resistance Research in Gothenburg (CARe), Gothenburg, Sweden.
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jan 30;12(3):e0327523. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03275-23.
Phenotypic analysis assays such as bacterial cytological profiling (BCP) have become increasingly popular for antibiotic mode of action analysis. A plethora of dyes, protein fusions, and reporter strains are available and have been used for this purpose, enabling both rapid mode of action categorization and in-depth analysis of antibiotic mechanisms. However, non-expert researchers may struggle choosing suitable assays and interpreting results. This is a particular problem for antibiotics that have multiple or complex targets, such as the bacterial cell envelope. Here, we set out to curate a minimal set of accessible and affordable phenotypic assays that allow distinction between membrane and cell wall targets, can identify dual-action inhibitors, and can be implemented in most research environments. To this end, we employed BCP, membrane potential, fluidity, and cell wall synthesis assays. To assess specificity and ease of interpretation, we tested three well-characterized and commercially available reference antibiotics: the potassium ionophore valinomycin, the lipid II-binding glycopeptide vancomycin, and the dual-action lantibiotic nisin, which binds lipid II and forms a membrane pore. Based on our experiments, we suggest a minimal set of BCP, a membrane-potentiometric probe, and fluorescent protein fusions to MinD and MreB as basic assay set and recommend complementing these assays with Laurdan-based fluidity measurements and a reporter fusion, where indicated. We believe that our results can provide guidance for researchers who wish to use phenotypic analysis for mode of action studies but do not possess the specialized equipment or expert knowledge to employ the full breadth of possible techniques.IMPORTANCEPhenotypic analysis assays using specialized fluorescence fusions and dyes have become increasingly popular in antibiotic mode of action analysis. However, it can be difficult to implement these methods due to the need for specialized equipment and/or the complexity of bacterial cell biology and physiology, making the interpretation of results difficult for non-experts. This is especially problematic for compounds that have multiple or pleiotropic effects, such as inhibitors of the bacterial cell envelope. In order to make phenotypic analysis assays accessible to labs, whose primary expertise is not bacterial cell biology, or with limited equipment and resources, a set of simple and broadly accessible assays is needed that is easy to implement, execute, and interpret. Here, we have curated a set of assays and strains that does not need highly specialized equipment, can be performed in most labs, and is straightforward to interpret without knowing the intricacies of bacterial cell biology.
诸如细菌细胞学分析(BCP)等表型分析方法在抗生素作用模式分析中越来越受欢迎。有大量的染料、蛋白质融合物和报告菌株可供使用,并已用于此目的,既能实现快速的作用模式分类,又能深入分析抗生素作用机制。然而,非专业研究人员在选择合适的分析方法和解释结果时可能会遇到困难。对于具有多个或复杂靶点的抗生素,如细菌细胞壁,这是一个特别的问题。在此,我们着手挑选一组最少的易于获取且经济实惠的表型分析方法,这些方法能够区分膜靶点和细胞壁靶点,能够识别双重作用抑制剂,并且可以在大多数研究环境中实施。为此,我们采用了BCP、膜电位、流动性和细胞壁合成分析方法。为了评估特异性和解释的简易性,我们测试了三种特征明确且可商购的参考抗生素:钾离子载体缬氨霉素、脂质II结合糖肽万古霉素以及结合脂质II并形成膜孔的双重作用羊毛硫抗生素乳链菌肽。基于我们的实验,我们建议将一组最少的BCP、一种膜电位测定探针以及与MinD和MreB融合的荧光蛋白作为基本分析方法组合,并建议在适当情况下,用基于劳丹素的流动性测量和报告基因融合来补充这些分析方法。我们相信,我们的结果可以为那些希望使用表型分析进行作用模式研究,但不具备使用所有可能技术所需的专业设备或专业知识的研究人员提供指导。
重要性
使用专门的荧光融合物和染料进行的表型分析方法在抗生素作用模式分析中越来越受欢迎。然而,由于需要专门的设备和/或细菌细胞生物学和生理学的复杂性,这些方法可能难以实施,使得非专业人员难以解释结果。对于具有多种或多效性作用的化合物,如细菌细胞壁抑制剂,这一问题尤为突出。为了使主要专业领域不是细菌细胞生物学的实验室,或设备和资源有限的实验室能够使用表型分析方法,需要一组简单且广泛适用的分析方法,这些方法易于实施、执行和解释。在此,我们挑选了一组分析方法和菌株,它们不需要高度专业化的设备,可以在大多数实验室中进行,并且在不了解细菌细胞生物学复杂性的情况下也易于解释。