Suppr超能文献

手术治疗胫骨平台骨折 PROMIS 物理功能量表的 MCID。

The MCID of the PROMIS physical function instrument for operatively treated tibial plateau fractures.

机构信息

University of Utah, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

University of Washington, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Injury. 2024 Apr;55(4):111375. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111375. Epub 2024 Jan 22.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Understanding minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in patient reported outcome measurement are important in improving patient care. The purpose of this study was to determine the MCID of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) domain for patients who underwent operative fixation of a tibial plateau fracture.

METHODS

All patients with tibial plateau fractures that underwent operative fixation at a single level 1 trauma center were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients without PROMIS PF scores or an anchor question at two-time points postoperatively were excluded. Anchor-based and distribution-based MCIDs were calculated.

RESULTS

The MCID for PROMIS PF scores was 4.85 in the distribution-based method and 3.93 (SD 14.01) in the anchor-based method. There was significantly more improvement in the score from the first postoperative score (<7 weeks) to the second postoperative time (<78 weeks) in the improvement group 10.95 (SD 9.95) compared to the no improvement group 7.02 (SD 9.87) in the anchor-based method (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients achieving MCID at 7 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year were 37-42 %, 57-62 %, 80-84 %, and 95-87 %, respectively.

DISCUSSION

This study identified MCID values for PROMIS PF scores in the tibial plateau fracture population. Both MCID scores were similar, resulting in a reliable value for future studies and clinical decision-making. An MCID of 3.93 to 4.85 can be used as a clinical and investigative standard for patients with operative tibial plateau fractures.

摘要

简介

了解患者报告结局测量中的最小临床重要差异(MCID)对于改善患者护理非常重要。本研究的目的是确定接受胫骨平台骨折手术固定的患者的患者报告结局测量系统(PROMIS)身体功能(PF)域的 MCID。

方法

通过当前程序术语(CPT)代码确定在一级创伤中心接受单一水平手术固定的胫骨平台骨折患者。排除没有 PROMIS PF 评分或术后两个时间点没有锚定问题的患者。计算基于分布和基于锚定的 MCID。

结果

基于分布的方法中 PROMIS PF 评分的 MCID 为 4.85,基于锚定的方法为 3.93(SD 14.01)。在基于锚定的方法中,从第一次术后评分(<7 周)到第二次术后时间(<78 周),改善组的评分提高了 10.95(SD 9.95),而无改善组为 7.02(SD 9.87)(P < 0.001)。在基于锚定的方法中,7 周、3 个月、6 个月和 1 年时达到 MCID 的患者百分比分别为 37-42%、57-62%、80-84%和 95-87%。

讨论

本研究确定了胫骨平台骨折患者 PROMIS PF 评分的 MCID 值。两个 MCID 分数相似,为未来的研究和临床决策提供了可靠的价值。3.93 至 4.85 的 MCID 可作为接受手术治疗的胫骨平台骨折患者的临床和研究标准。

相似文献

1
The MCID of the PROMIS physical function instrument for operatively treated tibial plateau fractures.
Injury. 2024 Apr;55(4):111375. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111375. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
3
What Are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI Instruments Among Patients With Spinal Conditions?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Oct;476(10):2027-2036. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000419.
4
The trajectory of patient-reported outcomes and minimal clinically important differences in isolated and polytraumatic pelvis and acetabular fractures.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Oct;34(7):3465-3472. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03631-w. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
5
Minimal Clinically Important Differences of PROMIS PF in Ankle Fracture Patients.
Foot Ankle Int. 2022 Jul;43(7):968-972. doi: 10.1177/10711007221091815. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
7
Determining the clinical significance of the PROMIS physical function score in the setting of femur fractures.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Aug;33(6):2277-2282. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03417-6. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
8
What Is the Clinical Benefit of Common Orthopaedic Procedures as Assessed by the PROMIS Versus Other Validated Outcomes Tools?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Sep 1;480(9):1672-1681. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002241. Epub 2022 May 10.
9
Minimal Clinically Important Difference for PROMIS Physical Function in Patients With Distal Radius Fractures.
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Jun;44(6):454-459.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.02.015. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
10
The Minimal Clinically Important Difference for PROMIS Physical Function in Patients With Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis.
Hand (N Y). 2021 Sep;16(5):638-643. doi: 10.1177/1558944719880025. Epub 2019 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
The trajectory of patient-reported outcomes and minimal clinically important differences in isolated and polytraumatic pelvis and acetabular fractures.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Oct;34(7):3465-3472. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03631-w. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
3
Minimal Clinically Important Differences of PROMIS PF in Ankle Fracture Patients.
Foot Ankle Int. 2022 Jul;43(7):968-972. doi: 10.1177/10711007221091815. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
4
Epidemiological characterization of tibial plateau fractures.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Feb 19;17(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02988-8.
7
Long-term outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures.
Injury. 2020 Apr;51(4):1097-1102. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.03.003. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
8
The Minimal Clinically Important Difference for PROMIS Physical Function in Patients With Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis.
Hand (N Y). 2021 Sep;16(5):638-643. doi: 10.1177/1558944719880025. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
10
Mapping recovery in simple and complex tibial plateau fracture fixation.
Bone Joint J. 2019 Aug;101-B(8):1009-1014. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B8.BJJ-2018-1288.R1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验