• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术治疗胫骨平台骨折 PROMIS 物理功能量表的 MCID。

The MCID of the PROMIS physical function instrument for operatively treated tibial plateau fractures.

机构信息

University of Utah, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

University of Washington, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Injury. 2024 Apr;55(4):111375. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111375. Epub 2024 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2024.111375
PMID:38290908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11351672/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Understanding minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in patient reported outcome measurement are important in improving patient care. The purpose of this study was to determine the MCID of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) domain for patients who underwent operative fixation of a tibial plateau fracture.

METHODS

All patients with tibial plateau fractures that underwent operative fixation at a single level 1 trauma center were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients without PROMIS PF scores or an anchor question at two-time points postoperatively were excluded. Anchor-based and distribution-based MCIDs were calculated.

RESULTS

The MCID for PROMIS PF scores was 4.85 in the distribution-based method and 3.93 (SD 14.01) in the anchor-based method. There was significantly more improvement in the score from the first postoperative score (<7 weeks) to the second postoperative time (<78 weeks) in the improvement group 10.95 (SD 9.95) compared to the no improvement group 7.02 (SD 9.87) in the anchor-based method (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients achieving MCID at 7 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year were 37-42 %, 57-62 %, 80-84 %, and 95-87 %, respectively.

DISCUSSION

This study identified MCID values for PROMIS PF scores in the tibial plateau fracture population. Both MCID scores were similar, resulting in a reliable value for future studies and clinical decision-making. An MCID of 3.93 to 4.85 can be used as a clinical and investigative standard for patients with operative tibial plateau fractures.

摘要

简介

了解患者报告结局测量中的最小临床重要差异(MCID)对于改善患者护理非常重要。本研究的目的是确定接受胫骨平台骨折手术固定的患者的患者报告结局测量系统(PROMIS)身体功能(PF)域的 MCID。

方法

通过当前程序术语(CPT)代码确定在一级创伤中心接受单一水平手术固定的胫骨平台骨折患者。排除没有 PROMIS PF 评分或术后两个时间点没有锚定问题的患者。计算基于分布和基于锚定的 MCID。

结果

基于分布的方法中 PROMIS PF 评分的 MCID 为 4.85,基于锚定的方法为 3.93(SD 14.01)。在基于锚定的方法中,从第一次术后评分(<7 周)到第二次术后时间(<78 周),改善组的评分提高了 10.95(SD 9.95),而无改善组为 7.02(SD 9.87)(P < 0.001)。在基于锚定的方法中,7 周、3 个月、6 个月和 1 年时达到 MCID 的患者百分比分别为 37-42%、57-62%、80-84%和 95-87%。

讨论

本研究确定了胫骨平台骨折患者 PROMIS PF 评分的 MCID 值。两个 MCID 分数相似,为未来的研究和临床决策提供了可靠的价值。3.93 至 4.85 的 MCID 可作为接受手术治疗的胫骨平台骨折患者的临床和研究标准。

相似文献

1
The MCID of the PROMIS physical function instrument for operatively treated tibial plateau fractures.手术治疗胫骨平台骨折 PROMIS 物理功能量表的 MCID。
Injury. 2024 Apr;55(4):111375. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111375. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
2
Minimal Clinically Important Differences of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function in Patients With Tibial Shaft Fracture.患者报告结局测量信息系统胫骨骨干骨折患者躯体功能项目的最小临床重要差异。
J Orthop Trauma. 2023 Aug 1;37(8):401-406. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002600.
3
What Are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI Instruments Among Patients With Spinal Conditions?脊柱疾病患者 PROMIS、NDI 和 ODI 量表的 MCID 是多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Oct;476(10):2027-2036. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000419.
4
The trajectory of patient-reported outcomes and minimal clinically important differences in isolated and polytraumatic pelvis and acetabular fractures.孤立性骨盆和髋臼骨折与多发创伤性骨盆和髋臼骨折患者报告结局和最小临床重要差异的轨迹。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Oct;34(7):3465-3472. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03631-w. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
5
Minimal Clinically Important Differences of PROMIS PF in Ankle Fracture Patients.PROMIS PF 在踝关节骨折患者中的最小临床重要差异。
Foot Ankle Int. 2022 Jul;43(7):968-972. doi: 10.1177/10711007221091815. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
6
Minimal Clinically Important Difference for PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference in Patients Following Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture.患者接受桡骨远端骨折手术后,PROMIS 体力功能和疼痛干扰的最小临床重要差异。
J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Feb;47(2):137-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.08.025. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
7
Determining the clinical significance of the PROMIS physical function score in the setting of femur fractures.在股骨骨折的情况下,确定 PROMIS 身体功能评分的临床意义。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Aug;33(6):2277-2282. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03417-6. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
8
What Is the Clinical Benefit of Common Orthopaedic Procedures as Assessed by the PROMIS Versus Other Validated Outcomes Tools?常见骨科手术的临床获益有哪些?与其他经过验证的结局评估工具相比,PROMIS 评估如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Sep 1;480(9):1672-1681. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002241. Epub 2022 May 10.
9
Minimal Clinically Important Difference for PROMIS Physical Function in Patients With Distal Radius Fractures.桡骨远端骨折患者PROMIS身体功能的最小临床重要差异
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Jun;44(6):454-459.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.02.015. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
10
The Minimal Clinically Important Difference for PROMIS Physical Function in Patients With Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis.拇指腕掌关节炎患者 PROMIS 体力功能的最小临床重要差异。
Hand (N Y). 2021 Sep;16(5):638-643. doi: 10.1177/1558944719880025. Epub 2019 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Fracture characteristics and functional outcomes for Schatzker V/VI bicondylar tibial plateau fractures with a separate tubercle fragment: a comparative study.伴有单独结节骨折块的Schatzker V/VI型双髁胫骨平台骨折的骨折特征及功能结果:一项比较研究
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Jan 7;145(1):112. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05660-4.
2
Patient-reported outcomes after tibial plateau fracture: infection confers greatest risk of poor outcome.胫骨平台骨折后的患者报告结局:感染带来的预后不良风险最大。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Dec 12;35(1):34. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04160-w.

本文引用的文献

1
The trajectory of patient-reported outcomes and minimal clinically important differences in isolated and polytraumatic pelvis and acetabular fractures.孤立性骨盆和髋臼骨折与多发创伤性骨盆和髋臼骨折患者报告结局和最小临床重要差异的轨迹。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Oct;34(7):3465-3472. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03631-w. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
2
Minimal Clinically Important Differences of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function in Patients With Tibial Shaft Fracture.患者报告结局测量信息系统胫骨骨干骨折患者躯体功能项目的最小临床重要差异。
J Orthop Trauma. 2023 Aug 1;37(8):401-406. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002600.
3
Minimal Clinically Important Differences of PROMIS PF in Ankle Fracture Patients.PROMIS PF 在踝关节骨折患者中的最小临床重要差异。
Foot Ankle Int. 2022 Jul;43(7):968-972. doi: 10.1177/10711007221091815. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
4
Epidemiological characterization of tibial plateau fractures.胫骨平台骨折的流行病学特征。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Feb 19;17(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02988-8.
5
The minimal clinically important difference of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function and upper extremity computer adaptive tests and QuickDASH in the setting of elbow trauma.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)身体功能及上肢计算机自适应测试和QuickDASH在肘部创伤情况下的最小临床重要差异。
JSES Int. 2021 Aug 8;5(6):1132-1138. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.06.005. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
Patient-Reported Outcomes for Fractures of the Acetabulum: A Comparison Between Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System and Traditional Instruments.患者报告的髋臼骨折结局:患者报告结局信息系统与传统工具的比较。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Jan 15;30(2):71-78. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-01324.
7
Long-term outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures.双髁胫骨平台骨折切开复位内固定术后的长期疗效。
Injury. 2020 Apr;51(4):1097-1102. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.03.003. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
8
The Minimal Clinically Important Difference for PROMIS Physical Function in Patients With Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis.拇指腕掌关节炎患者 PROMIS 体力功能的最小临床重要差异。
Hand (N Y). 2021 Sep;16(5):638-643. doi: 10.1177/1558944719880025. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
9
Prevalence of Deep Surgical Site Infection After Repair of Periarticular Knee Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.关节周围膝关节骨折修复术后深部手术部位感染的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e199951. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9951.
10
Mapping recovery in simple and complex tibial plateau fracture fixation.胫骨平台骨折固定中简单与复杂骨折的愈合情况对比。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Aug;101-B(8):1009-1014. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B8.BJJ-2018-1288.R1.