SUNY at Buffalo, School of Dental Medicine - Oral Diagnostic Sciences, Buffalo, New York, USA.
J Forensic Sci. 2024 Sep;69(5):1630-1636. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15471. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
This paper reviews MFI's from a historical perspective commencing with DVI in the late 20th century. For this paper, this era, 1970-90s is designated as the early modern period. As DVI by DNA analysis is introduced into the process, in the beginning of the mid-1990s, or late modern period, a shift in ID modality usage is noted. A statistical analysis of the primary identification (ID) methods established that dental identification was the majority identifier, or gold standard, in the early modern era. Although primarily viewed from a United States (US) perspective, referenced international incidents parallel the incidents investigated by US authorities. The introduction of DNA demarcated the early from the late modern era. Through research, development, and application this highly discriminating ID method would effectively, surpass dental ID as the gold standard into the late modern era. DNA ID would eventually overcome early criticism regarding cost and time consumption. In the MFI's discussed, the discriminating accuracy of DNA, when referenced against the dental identifications, validated the reliability of dental ID. Errors will be significantly minimized through confirmatory reconciliation by more than one ID method. In conclusion despite increased usage of DNA, dental ID has not been eliminated and remains a major contributor to DVI. Dental ID continues to develop through increased application of advanced imaging technology. Despite DNA's rapid advancement and application to DVI, the multidisciplinary approach to scientific identification should remain in the near future. Therefore, comparative dental ID will remain an important and reliable contributor to DVI.
本文从历史角度回顾了 MFI,从 20 世纪后期的 DVI 开始。在本文中,这个时代,即 1970 年代至 90 年代被指定为现代早期。随着 DNA 分析被引入 DVI 过程中,在 90 年代中期,或称为晚期现代,我们注意到 ID 模式的使用发生了转变。对主要识别(ID)方法的统计分析表明,在现代早期,牙科识别是主要的识别方法,或金标准。尽管主要从美国(US)的角度来看,但参考的国际事件与美国当局调查的事件相似。DNA 的引入划定了现代早期和晚期的界限。通过研究、开发和应用,这种高度区分性的 ID 方法将有效地将牙科 ID 从现代早期取代为金标准,进入晚期现代。DNA ID 最终克服了早期关于成本和时间消耗的批评。在讨论的 MFI 中,当 DNA 与牙科 ID 进行参考时,其区分准确性验证了牙科 ID 的可靠性。通过使用多种 ID 方法进行确认性核对,可以显著减少错误。总之,尽管 DNA 的使用增加了,但牙科 ID 并未被淘汰,并且仍然是 DVI 的主要贡献者。牙科 ID 通过增加先进成像技术的应用不断发展。尽管 DNA 快速发展并应用于 DVI,但多学科的科学识别方法在不久的将来仍应保持。因此,比较牙科 ID 将仍然是 DVI 的一个重要且可靠的贡献者。