Suppr超能文献

使用前瞻性心电图触发的冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术识别左心室功能障碍。

Identifying left ventricular dysfunction using prospective electrocardiogram-triggered coronary computed tomography angiography.

作者信息

Sharma Ashwin, Erthal Fernanda, Juneau Daniel, Alzahrani Atif, Alenazy Ali, Massalha Samia, Yam Yeung, Kabir Bilaal, Small Gary R, Chow Benjamin J W

机构信息

Department of Medicine (Cardiology), University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Medicine (Cardiology), University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada; Dasa/CDPI, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil and Dasa/Alta, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2024 Mar-Apr;18(2):187-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2024.01.009. Epub 2024 Jan 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is an important non-invasive tool for the assessment of coronary artery disease and the delivery of information incremental to coronary anatomy. CCTA measured left ventricular (LV) mid-diastolic volume (LV) and LV mass (LV) have important prognostic information but the utility of prospectively ECG-triggered CCTA to predict reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine if indexed LV (LV) and the LV:LV ratio on CCTA can identify patients with reduced LVEF.

MATERIALS/METHODS: 8179 patients with prospectively ECG-triggered CCTA between November 2014 and December 2019 were reviewed. A subset derivation cohort of 4352 healthy patients was used to define normal LV and LV:LV. Sex-specific thresholds were tested in a validation cohort of 1783 patients, excluded from the derivation cohort, with cardiac disease and known LVEF. The operating characteristics for 1 SD above the mean were tested for the identification of abnormal LVEF, LVEF≤35 ​% and ≤30 ​%.

RESULTS

The derivation cohort had a mean LV of 61.0 ​± ​13.7 ​mL/m and LV:LV of 1.11 ​± ​0.24 ​mL/g. LV and LV:LV were both higher in patients with reduced LVEF than those with normal LVEF (98.8 ​± ​40.8 ​mL/m vs. 63.3 ​± ​19.7 ​mL/m, p ​< ​0.001, and 1.32 ​± ​0.44 ​mL/g vs. 1.05 ​± ​0.28 ​mL/g, p ​< ​0.001). Both mean LV and LV:LV increased with the severity of LVEF reduction. Sex-specific LV thresholds were 79 ​% and 80 ​% specific for identifying abnormal LVEF in females (LV ​≥ ​69.9 ​mL/m) and males (LV ​≥ ​78.8 ​mL/m), respectively. LV:LV thresholds had high specificity (87 ​%) in both females (LV:LV ​≥ ​1.39 ​mL/g) and males (LV:LV ​≥ ​1.30 ​mL/g).

CONCLUSION

Our study provides reference thresholds for LV and LV:LV on prospectively ECG-triggered CCTA, which may identify patients who require further LV function assessment.

摘要

目的

冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)是评估冠状动脉疾病及提供冠状动脉解剖结构之外增量信息的重要无创工具。CCTA测量的左心室(LV)舒张中期容积(LV)和LV质量(LV)具有重要的预后信息,但前瞻性心电图触发的CCTA预测左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低的效用尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定CCTA上的LV指数(LV)和LV:LV比值能否识别LVEF降低的患者。

材料/方法:回顾了2014年11月至2019年12月期间接受前瞻性心电图触发CCTA检查的8179例患者。一个由4352例健康患者组成的子集推导队列用于定义正常的LV和LV:LV。在一个由1783例患者组成的验证队列中测试了性别特异性阈值,这些患者被排除在推导队列之外,患有心脏病且已知LVEF。测试高于平均值1个标准差时的操作特征,以识别异常LVEF、LVEF≤35%和≤30%的情况。

结果

推导队列的平均LV为61.0±13.7mL/m,LV:LV为1.11±0.24mL/g。LVEF降低的患者的LV和LV:LV均高于LVEF正常的患者(98.8±40.8mL/m对63.3±19.7mL/m,p<0.001;1.32±0.44mL/g对1.05±0.28mL/g,p<0.001)。平均LV和LV:LV均随LVEF降低的严重程度增加。性别特异性LV阈值在女性(LV≥69.9mL/m)和男性(LV≥78.8mL/m)中识别异常LVEF的特异性分别为79%和80%。LV:LV阈值在女性(LV:LV≥1.39mL/g)和男性(LV:LV≥1.30mL/g)中均具有高特异性(87%)。

结论

我们的研究提供了前瞻性心电图触发CCTA上LV和LV:LV的参考阈值,这可能有助于识别需要进一步评估LV功能的患者。

相似文献

1
Identifying left ventricular dysfunction using prospective electrocardiogram-triggered coronary computed tomography angiography.
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2024 Mar-Apr;18(2):187-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2024.01.009. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
2
Mid-diastolic left ventricular volume and mass: Normal values for coronary computed tomography angiography.
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Mar-Apr;11(2):135-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
4
The estimation of left ventricular function using prospective ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography.
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2023 Nov-Dec;17(6):429-435. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
7
Differences in left ventricular measurements: Attenuation versus contour based methods.
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 Jul-Aug;13(4):174-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Aug 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验