• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较冠心病患者和非冠心病患者的特定领域和强度的身体活动。

Comparing domain- and intensity-specific physical activity in coronary heart disease and non-CHD individuals.

机构信息

Department of Sport Industry Studies and Exercise Medicine Center for Diabetes and Cancer Patients, Yonsei University, 50, Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Frontier Research Institute of Convergence Sports Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 1;14(1):2622. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52764-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-52764-3
PMID:38297008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10831062/
Abstract

Although increase in physical activity is important to improve prognosis of cardiac patients in addition to hospital-based exercise cardiac rehabilitation, their physical activity levels are not properly understood. This study aimed to examine domain- and intensity-specific physical activity in individuals with coronary heart disease (CHD) and compare them with non-CHD individuals. Data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) from 2014 to 2019 were analyzed, including 1083 CHD patients and 38,532 non-CHD individuals. The inclusion criteria were age 19 years or older and data not missing for CHD information. Before and after propensity score matching (PSM) for age, sex, body mass index, education, household income, alcohol intake, and smoking status, domain (leisure, work, transportation)-and intensity (moderate, vigorous) -specific physical activity participation levels were compared between individuals with and without CHD. Before PSM, CHD individuals were older, less educated, more sedentary, and participated less in PAs compared to non-CHD individuals. After PSM, CHD individuals had similar levels of domain-specific PAs. However, they had higher work-related PA levels (29.7 ± 209.6 vs. 42.1 ± 291.3 min/week p = 0.022) and more sedentary time (487.2 ± 224.2 vs. 514.1 ± 228.7. p = 0.003) than those without CHD. Subgroup analysis revealed lower leisure-related PA in men with CHD (63.5 ± 165.5 vs. 47.3 ± 140.2, p < 0.05) and higher work-related PA in women with CHD (18.9 ± 159.7 vs. 57.1 ± 397.5, p < 0.01). Among those < 65 years of age, individuals with CHD spent more time sedentary than individuals without CHD. CHD individuals are not physically inactive compared with non-CHD individuals who are similar in sociodemographic status and lifestyle. CHD patients' PA levels may have been underestimated.

摘要

尽管增加身体活动对于改善心脏病人的预后很重要,除了医院为基础的运动心脏康复外,他们的身体活动水平并没有得到适当的了解。本研究旨在检查冠心病(CHD)患者的特定领域和特定强度的身体活动,并将其与非 CHD 个体进行比较。本研究使用了 2014 年至 2019 年韩国国家健康和营养检查调查(KNHANES)的数据,其中包括 1083 名 CHD 患者和 38532 名非 CHD 个体。纳入标准为年龄在 19 岁及以上且 CHD 信息无缺失。在进行年龄、性别、体重指数、教育程度、家庭收入、饮酒和吸烟状况的倾向评分匹配(PSM)之前和之后,比较了有和无 CHD 个体在休闲、工作、交通等领域(中等、剧烈)特定身体活动参与水平。在 PSM 之前,CHD 患者年龄较大,受教育程度较低,久坐不动,参加 PA 的比例较低。PSM 后,CHD 患者的特定领域 PA 水平相似。然而,他们的工作相关 PA 水平更高(29.7±209.6 与 42.1±291.3,p=0.022),久坐时间更长(487.2±224.2 与 514.1±228.7,p=0.003)。亚组分析显示,男性 CHD 患者的休闲相关 PA 较低(63.5±165.5 与 47.3±140.2,p<0.05),女性 CHD 患者的工作相关 PA 较高(18.9±159.7 与 57.1±397.5,p<0.01)。在年龄<65 岁的人群中,CHD 患者比非 CHD 患者久坐的时间更多。与社会人口统计学和生活方式相似的非 CHD 个体相比,CHD 患者的身体活动水平可能被低估了。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afa0/10831062/40c5b62fe47f/41598_2024_52764_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afa0/10831062/40c5b62fe47f/41598_2024_52764_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afa0/10831062/40c5b62fe47f/41598_2024_52764_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing domain- and intensity-specific physical activity in coronary heart disease and non-CHD individuals.比较冠心病患者和非冠心病患者的特定领域和强度的身体活动。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 1;14(1):2622. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52764-3.
2
Intensity- and domain-specific physical activity levels between cancer survivors and non-cancer diagnosis individuals: a propensity score matching analysis.癌症幸存者与非癌症诊断个体之间的强度和特定领域的身体活动水平:倾向评分匹配分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Feb;29(2):661-668. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05514-w. Epub 2020 May 19.
3
Assessing the 'active couch potato' phenomenon in cardiac rehabilitation: rationale and study protocol.评估心脏康复中的“活跃型久坐不动者”现象:理论依据与研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb 27;16:75. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1313-x.
4
Physical activity and coronary heart disease in women: is "no pain, no gain" passé?女性的身体活动与冠心病:“不劳无获”过时了吗?
JAMA. 2001 Mar 21;285(11):1447-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.11.1447.
5
Physical activity and odds of coronary heart disease among Lebanese women.黎巴嫩女性的身体活动与冠心病患病几率
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 19;24(1):516. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18042-7.
6
Association between physical inactivity and health-related quality of life in adults with coronary heart disease.体力活动不足与冠心病成年人健康相关生活质量的关系。
Maturitas. 2019 Oct;128:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
7
Frequency, Type, and Volume of Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Young Women.年轻女性休闲时间身体活动的频率、类型和量与冠心病风险
Circulation. 2016 Jul 26;134(4):290-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021516.
8
Patterns of Physical Activity and the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease: A Pilot Study.体力活动模式与冠心病风险:一项初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 17;15(4):778. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040778.
9
Prevalence of physical activity and sedentary behavior among adults with cardiovascular disease in the United States.美国心血管疾病成年患者的身体活动和久坐行为患病率
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2014 Nov-Dec;34(6):406-19. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000064.
10
Physical activity lowers all-cause and cardio-cerebrovascular mortality in adults with coronary heart disease.身体活动可降低冠心病成人的全因和心脑血管死亡率。
Int J Cardiol. 2024 Sep 1;410:132225. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132225. Epub 2024 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Mediating effect of illness perception between self-care ability and health-promoting behaviors among patients with stable coronary artery disease.冠心病稳定期患者疾病认知在自我护理能力与健康促进行为之间的中介作用
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 21;20(2):e0316551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316551. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 6;11(11):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4.
2
Objectively Measured Physical Activity in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Cross-Validation Study.客观测量冠心病患者的体力活动:一项交叉验证研究。
Biosensors (Basel). 2021 Sep 6;11(9):318. doi: 10.3390/bios11090318.
3
The role of cardiac rehabilitation in improving cardiovascular outcomes.心脏康复在改善心血管结局中的作用。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022 Mar;19(3):180-194. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00611-7. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
4
Association between domain-specific physical activity and diabetes in Korean adults.韩国成年人特定领域体力活动与糖尿病之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 22;11(1):13066. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92560-x.
5
Korea Heart Disease Fact Sheet 2020: Analysis of Nationwide Data.《2020年韩国心脏病情况说明书:全国数据解析》
Korean Circ J. 2021 Jun;51(6):495-503. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2021.0097.
6
Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study.全球心血管疾病负担及危险因素, 1990-2019:来自 GBD 2019 研究的更新。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Dec 22;76(25):2982-3021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010.
7
Sedentary behaviour in cardiovascular disease patients: Risk group identification and the impact of cardiac rehabilitation.心血管疾病患者的久坐行为:风险群体识别与心脏康复的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Mar 1;326:194-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.11.014. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
8
Underutilization of Hospital-based Cardiac Rehabilitation after Acute Myocardial Infarction in Korea.韩国急性心肌梗死后医院心脏康复的未充分利用。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Aug 3;35(30):e262. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e262.
9
Association Between Neighborhood Walkability and Predicted 10-Year Cardiovascular Disease Risk: The CANHEART (Cardiovascular Health in Ambulatory Care Research Team) Cohort.社区步行环境与预测 10 年心血管疾病风险的关系:CANHEART(门诊护理研究团队的心血管健康)队列。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 5;8(21):e013146. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013146. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
10
Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Alone and Hybrid With Center-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.家庭为基础的心脏康复单独治疗和与中心为基础的心脏康复联合治疗心力衰竭:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Aug 20;8(16):e012779. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012779. Epub 2019 Aug 17.