Yagi Nobuichiro, Ogawa Mana, Kuwajima Ken, Hasegawa Hiroko, Yamane Takafumi, Shiota Takahiro
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 8700, USA.
J Echocardiogr. 2024 Sep;22(3):152-161. doi: 10.1007/s12574-023-00638-4. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of flow status is crucial in low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS). However, the clinical implication of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3DTEE) on flow status evaluation remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the assessment of flow status using 3D TEE in low-gradient AS patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with low-gradient AS and preserved ejection fraction at our institution between 2019 and 2022. Patients were categorized into low-flow/low-gradient (LF-LG) AS or normal-flow/low-gradient (NF-LG) AS based on two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2DTTE). We compared the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) geometry between the two groups and reclassified them using stroke volume index (SVi) obtained by 3DTEE. RESULTS: Among 173 patients (105 with LF-LG AS and 68 with NF-LG AS), 54 propensity-matched pairs of patients were analyzed. 3DTEE-derived ellipticity index of LVOT was significantly higher in LF-LG AS patients compared to NF-LG AS patients (p = 0.012). We assessed the discordance in flow status classification between SVi and SVi in both groups using a cutoff value of 35 ml/m. The LF-LG AS group exhibited a significantly higher discordance rate compared to the NF-LG AS group, with rates of 50% and 2%, respectively. The optimal cutoff values of SVi for identifying low flow status, based on 2DTTE-derived cutoff values, were determined to be 43 ml/m. CONCLUSIONS: LVOT ellipticity in low-gradient AS patients varies depending on flow status, and this difference contributes to discrepancies between SVi and SVi, particularly in LF-LG AS patients. Utilizing SVi is valuable for accurately assessing flow status.
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020-10
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019-6-21
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017-3-15
Eur Heart J. 2022-2-12
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018-3-14