Ma Xinan, Li Yajun, Zhang Pan, Yi Jilong, Xu Yingjie, Hu Miaomiao, Wang Jinjing, Lan Wenya, Xu Guoqiang, Lu Yanan, Xu Pengfei, Feng Feng, Sun Wen, Chen Hao, Wu Zongyi
Department of Neurology, Huaibei Miners General Hospital, Huaibei, China.
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2025;54(1):70-80. doi: 10.1159/000536113. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
This research explored the factors influencing early neurological outcomes (ENO) in patients who had vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO) and received endovascular treatment (EVT), as well as examining the causal influence of ENO on the prognosis of VBAO patients.
A retrospective review was carried out on patients from 65 Chinese stroke centers, all within 24 h of the estimated occlusion time. ENO includes early neurological improvement (ENI) and early neurological deterioration (END), defined as a decrease or an increase of at least 4 points in NIHSS score between baseline and 24 h after EVT. Death within 24 h after EVT was also considered as END. END was further divided into explained END and unexplained END (unEND). Independent predictors of ENO and the association between ENO and outcomes in patients with VBAO were determined using center-adjusted analyses. The study developed a multivariate logistic regression model to examine the comparative risk of unEND versus explained END on the clinical outcomes in VBAO patients.
A total of 2,257 patients were included. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.03-1.30) and successful reperfusion (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.02-1.30) were associated with ENI. Baseline NIHSS (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.53-0.68), successful reperfusion (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.71-0.89), and puncture to reperfusion time (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.03-1.33) were associated with END. When examining 3-month prognostic indexes, both END and ENI were found to be linked to the 3-month outcomes, but in opposite directions. A subgroup analysis of END suggested that unEND typically demonstrated a more favorable prognosis compared to explained END, although the prognosis remained generally unfavorable.
ENO, whether they manifested as early improvement or deterioration, were linked to the prognosis of VBAO patients undergoing EVT. The outcomes after unEND were more favorable than those following explained END.
本研究探讨了椎基底动脉闭塞(VBAO)并接受血管内治疗(EVT)患者早期神经功能结局(ENO)的影响因素,并研究了ENO对VBAO患者预后的因果影响。
对来自65个中国卒中中心的患者进行回顾性研究,所有患者均在估计闭塞时间的24小时内。ENO包括早期神经功能改善(ENI)和早期神经功能恶化(END),定义为基线与EVT后24小时之间美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分至少降低或升高4分。EVT后24小时内死亡也被视为END。END进一步分为可解释的END和无法解释的END(unEND)。使用中心校正分析确定ENO的独立预测因素以及VBAO患者中ENO与结局之间的关联。该研究建立了多变量逻辑回归模型,以检验unEND与可解释的END对VBAO患者临床结局的比较风险。
共纳入2257例患者。格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)(比值比:1.16,95%置信区间:1.03 - 1.30)和成功再灌注(比值比:1.15,95%置信区间:1.02 - 1.30)与ENI相关。基线NIHSS(比值比:0.60,95%置信区间:0.53 - 0.68)、成功再灌注(比值比:0.79, 95%置信区间:0.71 - 0.89)和穿刺至再灌注时间(比值比:1.17,95%置信区间:1.03 - 1.33)与END相关。在检查3个月预后指标时,发现END和ENI均与3个月结局相关,但方向相反。END的亚组分析表明,与可解释的END相比,unEND通常显示出更有利的预后,尽管预后总体上仍然不佳。
ENO,无论表现为早期改善还是恶化,均与接受EVT的VBAO患者的预后相关。unEND后的结局比可解释的END后的结局更有利。