Graduate Program in Dentistry, Atitus Educação - Passo Fundo, Brazil.
Graduate Program in Dentistry, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; School of Dentistry, Regional Integrated University of Upper Uruguai and Missions (URI), Erechim, RS, Brazil.
J Dent. 2024 May;144:104869. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104869. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
This study evaluates the endorsement of open science practices by dental journals.
This was a meta-research study that included journals listed in the 2021 Journal Citation Reports under Dentistry. A comprehensive evaluation was performed by accessing journal websites to ascertain the availability of publicly accessible instructions to authors in Portuguese, English, or Spanish. A researcher extracted information from the "Instructions for Authors" section, encompassing the journal's impact factor, mention of any reporting guidelines, details on data sharing, acceptance of articles in preprint format, and information regarding study protocol registration. Descriptive data analysis was conducted using the Stata 14.0 program, and an Open Science Score (OSS) (ranging from 0 to 100 %) was calculated for each journal by considering five open science practices. Pearson's correlation test was conducted to determine the relationship between the OSS score and journal impact factor.
Ninety journals were included in the study. Most journals (70 %) indicated the mandatory use of reporting guidelines, while 60 % recommended data sharing. Conversely, 46.7 % did not provide information on study protocol registration, and 44.4 % stipulated them as mandatory for authors. Regarding preprints, 50 % of the journals did not provide any information, but 46.7 % confirmed their acceptance. The mean OSS was 52.9 % (standard deviation 26.2). There was a weak correlation (Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.221) between the journal impact factor and OSS (P-value=0.036).
This study found varying degrees of endorsement of open science practices among dental journals.
Dental practitioners rely on high-quality, evidence-based research for informed decision-making. By assessing the endorsement of open science practices, our study contributes to improving the quality and reliability of dental research, ultimately enhancing the evidence base for clinical practice.
本研究评估了牙科期刊对开放科学实践的认可情况。
这是一项元研究,纳入了 2021 年期刊引文报告中列出的牙科期刊。通过访问期刊网站,全面评估了各期刊提供葡萄牙语、英语或西班牙语版作者指南的可用性。研究人员从“作者指南”部分提取信息,包括期刊的影响因子、是否提及任何报告指南、数据共享细节、预印本格式文章的接受情况以及研究方案注册信息。使用 Stata 14.0 程序进行描述性数据分析,并通过考虑五项开放科学实践,为每个期刊计算开放科学评分(OSS)(范围为 0 至 100%)。采用 Pearson 相关检验来确定 OSS 评分与期刊影响因子之间的关系。
本研究纳入了 90 种期刊。大多数期刊(70%)要求必须使用报告指南,而 60%建议数据共享。相反,46.7%的期刊未提供研究方案注册信息,而 44.4%则将其规定为作者的强制性要求。至于预印本,50%的期刊没有提供任何信息,但 46.7%确认接受预印本。平均 OSS 为 52.9%(标准差 26.2)。期刊影响因子与 OSS 之间存在弱相关(Pearson 相关系数为 0.221)(P 值=0.036)。
本研究发现牙科期刊对开放科学实践的认可程度存在差异。
牙科从业者依赖高质量、基于证据的研究来做出明智的决策。通过评估开放科学实践的认可情况,本研究有助于提高牙科研究的质量和可靠性,最终为临床实践提供更可靠的证据基础。