Kee Gaeun, Kang Hee Jun, Ahn Imjin, Gwon Hansle, Kim Yunha, Seo Hyeram, Choi Heejung, Cho Ha Na, Kim Minkyoung, Han JiYe, Park Seohyun, Kim Kyuwoong, Jun Tae Joon, Kim Young-Hak
Department of Information Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympicro 43gil, Songpagu, 05505, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Division of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympicro 43gil, Songpagu, 05505, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 17;10(2):e24620. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24620. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
Although interest in predicting drug-drug interactions is growing, many predictions are not verified by real-world data. This study aimed to confirm whether predicted polypharmacy side effects using public data also occur in data from actual patients.
We utilized a deep learning-based polypharmacy side effects prediction model to identify cefpodoxime-chlorpheniramine-lung edema combination with a high prediction score and a significant patient population. The retrospective study analyzed patients over 18 years old who were admitted to the Asan medical center between January 2000 and December 2020 and took cefpodoxime or chlorpheniramine orally. The three groups, cefpodoxime-treated, chlorpheniramine-treated, and cefpodoxime & chlorpheniramine-treated were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance them. Differences between the three groups were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model.
The study population comprised 54,043 patients with a history of taking cefpodoxime, 203,897 patients with a history of taking chlorpheniramine, and 1,628 patients with a history of taking cefpodoxime and chlorpheniramine simultaneously. After adjustment, the 1-year cumulative incidence of lung edema in the patient group that took cefpodoxime and chlorpheniramine simultaneously was significantly higher than in the patient groups that took cefpodoxime or chlorpheniramine only (p=0.001). Patients taking cefpodoxime and chlorpheniramine together had an increased risk of lung edema compared to those taking cefpodoxime alone [hazard ratio (HR) 2.10, 95% CI 1.26-3.52, p<0.005] and those taking chlorpheniramine alone, which also increased the risk of lung edema (HR 1.64, 95% CI 0.99-2.69, p=0.05).
Validation of polypharmacy side effect predictions with real-world data can aid patient and clinician decision-making before conducting randomized controlled trials. Simultaneous use of cefpodoxime and chlorpheniramine was associated with a higher long-term risk of lung edema compared to the use of cefpodoxime or chlorpheniramine alone.
尽管预测药物相互作用的关注度不断提高,但许多预测尚未得到真实世界数据的验证。本研究旨在确认使用公共数据预测的多药联用副作用是否也会出现在实际患者的数据中。
我们利用基于深度学习的多药联用副作用预测模型,识别出预测得分高且患者群体显著的头孢泊肟 - 氯苯那敏 - 肺水肿组合。这项回顾性研究分析了2000年1月至2020年12月期间入住峨山医疗中心且口服过头孢泊肟或氯苯那敏的18岁以上患者。使用治疗权重逆概率(IPTW)对头孢泊肟治疗组、氯苯那敏治疗组和头孢泊肟与氯苯那敏联合治疗组进行比较,以平衡各组。使用Kaplan-Meier方法和Cox比例风险模型分析三组之间的差异。
研究人群包括54043例有服用头孢泊肟病史的患者、203897例有服用氯苯那敏病史的患者以及1628例同时有服用头孢泊肟和氯苯那敏病史的患者。调整后,同时服用头孢泊肟和氯苯那敏的患者组中肺水肿的1年累积发病率显著高于仅服用头孢泊肟或氯苯那敏的患者组(p = 0.001)。与单独服用头孢泊肟的患者相比,同时服用头孢泊肟和氯苯那敏的患者发生肺水肿的风险增加[风险比(HR)2.10,95%置信区间1.26 - 3.52,p < 0.005],单独服用氯苯那敏的患者发生肺水肿的风险也增加(HR 1.64,95%置信区间0.99 - 2.69,p = 0.05)。
用真实世界数据验证多药联用副作用预测有助于在进行随机对照试验之前辅助患者和临床医生做出决策。与单独使用头孢泊肟或氯苯那敏相比,同时使用头孢泊肟和氯苯那敏与更高的长期肺水肿风险相关。