Dragonetti Joseph D, Posada Jacqueline G, Key Richard Garrett, Kugler Joseph L
Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA.
SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2024 Jan 31;12:2050313X241229008. doi: 10.1177/2050313X241229008. eCollection 2024.
Due to a lack of controlled, prospective trials examining the pathophysiology and treatment of catatonia, current guidelines vary regarding how and when to best use antipsychotics in the presence of catatonia and what factors to consider in a thorough risk-benefit analysis. The literature is especially limited in describing the risks and benefits of using long-acting injectable antipsychotics in the presence of catatonia. We describe four cases where patients with preexisting catatonia received long-acting injectable first generation antipsychotics and experienced severe adverse effects (three experienced worsening of catatonia and one experienced neuroleptic malignant syndrome). The evidence base for managing comorbid catatonia and psychosis remains underdeveloped and inconsistent, but there are numerous known risk factors for adverse antipsychotic reactions, which we describe in relation to these cases. Finally, we present best practices to consider when managing comorbid psychosis and catatonia, especially when considering the use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics.
由于缺乏针对紧张症病理生理学和治疗的对照性前瞻性试验,目前的指南在以下方面存在差异:在紧张症患者中如何以及何时最佳使用抗精神病药物,以及在全面的风险效益分析中应考虑哪些因素。关于在紧张症患者中使用长效注射用抗精神病药物的风险和益处,文献尤其有限。我们描述了4例先前患有紧张症的患者接受长效注射用第一代抗精神病药物并出现严重不良反应的病例(3例紧张症恶化,1例出现抗精神病药物恶性综合征)。管理共病紧张症和精神病的证据基础仍不发达且不一致,但有许多已知的抗精神病药物不良反应风险因素,我们结合这些病例进行了描述。最后,我们提出了在管理共病精神病和紧张症时应考虑的最佳做法,特别是在考虑使用长效注射用抗精神病药物时。