• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新辅助治疗和手术后食管鳞癌无病理淋巴结转移的预后因素。

Prognostic factors for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without pathological lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2024 Feb;48(2):416-426. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12033. Epub 2023 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1002/wjs.12033
PMID:38310312
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pathological lymph node metastasis (LNM) following multimodal therapy is an important indicator of poor prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer. However, a significant number of patients without LNM are still at high risk for recurrence.

METHODS

We assessed prognostic factors in 143 patients without pathological LNM who were diagnosed with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or chemoradiotherapy (NACRT), followed by surgery.

RESULTS

Using univariate and multivariate analyses of recurrence-free survival, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-4.23, and p = 0.02) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.04-1.43, and p = 0.02) were significant independent covariates. Furthermore, pretherapeutic LNM (HR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.003-3.76, and p = 0.049), NACRT (HR: 3.29, 95% CI: 1.30-8.33, and p = 0.01), poorly differentiated tumors (HR: 2.52, 95% CI: 1.28-4.98, and p = 0.01), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (HR: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.27-6.09, and p = 0.01) were also significant independent covariates. The recurrence rates among patients with 0/1, 2, 3, and 4/5 poor prognostic factors were significantly different (5.0%, 25.0%, 35.7%, and 53.8%, respectively; p = 0.001); the survival rates were stratified among these prognostic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretherapeutic CEA and NLR levels, pretherapeutic LNM, NACRT, poorly differentiated tumors, and LVI were significantly correlated with survivals in patients without pathological LNM after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery. Postoperative therapy should be considered in patients with ESCC with several indicators of recurrence, even in those without pathological LNM who underwent surgery following neoadjuvant therapy.

摘要

背景

接受多模式治疗后的病理性淋巴结转移(LNM)是食管癌患者预后不良的重要指标。然而,仍有相当数量无 LNM 的患者存在高复发风险。

方法

我们评估了 143 例局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者的预后因素,这些患者接受了新辅助化疗(NAC)或放化疗(NACRT),然后进行了手术。

结果

使用无进展生存的单因素和多因素分析,癌胚抗原(CEA)水平(危险比[HR]:2.17,95%置信区间[CI]:1.12-4.23,p=0.02)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)(HR:1.22,95%CI:1.04-1.43,p=0.02)是显著的独立预测因素。此外,治疗前 LNM(HR:1.94,95%CI:1.003-3.76,p=0.049)、NACRT(HR:3.29,95%CI:1.30-8.33,p=0.01)、低分化肿瘤(HR:2.52,95%CI:1.28-4.98,p=0.01)和脉管侵犯(LVI)(HR:2.78,95%CI:1.27-6.09,p=0.01)也是显著的独立预测因素。具有 0/1、2、3 和 4/5 个不良预后因素的患者的复发率有显著差异(分别为 5.0%、25.0%、35.7%和 53.8%,p=0.001);这些预后组之间的生存率进行了分层。

结论

治疗前 CEA 和 NLR 水平、治疗前 LNM、NACRT、低分化肿瘤和 LVI 与新辅助治疗和手术后无病理性 LNM 患者的生存显著相关。对于 ESCC 患者,即使在接受新辅助治疗和手术后无病理性 LNM 的患者中,也应考虑术后治疗。

相似文献

1
Prognostic factors for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without pathological lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery.新辅助治疗和手术后食管鳞癌无病理淋巴结转移的预后因素。
World J Surg. 2024 Feb;48(2):416-426. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12033. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
2
Outcomes of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who achieved a pathological complete response in the primary lesion by neoadjuvant treatment: a Japanese nationwide cohort study.新辅助治疗使原发性病变达到病理完全缓解的食管鳞癌患者的结局:一项日本全国性队列研究。
Esophagus. 2024 Jan;21(1):2-10. doi: 10.1007/s10388-023-01030-y. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
3
Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.新辅助放化疗治疗的食管鳞状细胞癌患者中淋巴管侵犯的预后意义
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;22(1):338-43. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3881-5. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
4
Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery with or without chemotherapy for patients with clinical stage III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.临床III期食管鳞状细胞癌患者新辅助化疗与先行手术加或不加化疗的比较。
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Feb 1;30(2):1-8. doi: 10.1111/dote.12473.
5
Prognostic Factors for Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery.新辅助化疗联合手术治疗后食管鳞癌患者的预后因素。
In Vivo. 2022 Nov-Dec;36(6):2852-2860. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13025.
6
Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on primary tumor and lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: additive association with prognosis.新辅助化疗对食管鳞状细胞癌原发肿瘤及淋巴结转移的影响:与预后的相加关联
Dis Esophagus. 2009;22(4):291-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00879.x. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
7
Novel pathological staging for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery.新的病理分期系统用于接受新辅助化疗后手术治疗的局部晚期食管鳞癌患者。
Esophagus. 2022 Apr;19(2):214-223. doi: 10.1007/s10388-021-00891-5. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
8
[Study on the prognostic influencing factors of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and the predictive value of inflammatory reaction indexes on its postoperative recurrence].食管鳞状细胞癌预后影响因素及炎症反应指标对其术后复发的预测价值研究
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2023 Feb 23;45(2):160-164. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20210326-00268.
9
SUV reduction predicts long-term survival in patients of non-pCR both in the tumor and lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.SUV 降低预示着新辅助放化疗后食管鳞癌患者肿瘤和淋巴结非完全病理缓解(non-pCR)时的长期生存。
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr 9;19(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02208-3.
10
Risk Factors for Recurrence in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Without Pathological Complete Response After Trimodal Therapy.三模态治疗后病理完全缓解的食管鳞癌复发的危险因素。
Anticancer Res. 2020 Aug;40(8):4387-4394. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14442.