Suppr超能文献

美国关于医疗自由和研究用干细胞程序的州法律:呼吁关注基于州的立法。

US state laws on medical freedom and investigational stem cell procedures: a call to focus on state-based legislation.

机构信息

Baker Institute Center for Health and Biosciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.

Baker Institute Center for Health and Biosciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Cytotherapy. 2024 Apr;26(4):404-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2024.01.002. Epub 2024 Feb 3.

Abstract

The premature marketing of investigational stem cell interventions (SCIs) is a growing market in the US. Several US states have passed legislation to permit and promote unproven and experimental SCIs for individuals with terminal or chronic diseases. These SCI medical freedom laws, which are largely based on right-to-try legislation, increase access to experimental SCIs with little to no oversight. They undermine federal regulatory authority and can compromise patient safety and informed decision-making. SCI medical freedom laws have gone largely unnoticed by scientific societies interested in the responsible translation of stem cell medicine. In this article, we analyze state SCI medical freedom laws and describe their detrimental impact on patients and society. We contend that scientific and medical societies are uniquely poised to advocate against state-based policy promoting unproven SCIs but recognize resource and other constraints to advocate for or against legislation in 50 states. We recommend societies establish coalitions and share resources to address state-based SCI medical freedom laws and other legislation surrounding unproven SCIs.

摘要

美国正在出现一种不成熟的研究性干细胞干预措施(SCsI)过早市场化的趋势。美国有几个州已经通过立法,允许并推广针对晚期或慢性病患者的未经证实和实验性 SCIs。这些 SCI 医疗自由法主要基于“尝试权”立法,增加了对实验性 SCIs 的获取途径,几乎没有或完全没有监督。这些法规削弱了联邦监管机构的权威,并可能危及患者安全和知情决策。对关注负责任地转化干细胞医学的科学学会来说,SCI 医疗自由法在很大程度上没有引起注意。在本文中,我们分析了州级 SCI 医疗自由法,并描述了它们对患者和社会的不利影响。我们认为,科学和医学学会特别适合倡导反对各州推广未经证实的SCsI,但也认识到在 50 个州中,倡导或反对立法存在资源和其他限制。我们建议学会建立联盟并共享资源,以解决州级 SCI 医疗自由法以及其他围绕未经证实的SCsI 的立法问题。

相似文献

1
US state laws on medical freedom and investigational stem cell procedures: a call to focus on state-based legislation.
Cytotherapy. 2024 Apr;26(4):404-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2024.01.002. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
2
Academic physician specialists' views toward the unproven stem cell intervention industry: areas of common ground and divergence.
Cytotherapy. 2021 Apr;23(4):348-356. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2020.12.011. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
4
Texas H.B. 810: Increased Access to Stem Cell Interventions or an Increase in Unproven Treatments?
Stem Cells Dev. 2018 Nov 1;27(21):1463-1465. doi: 10.1089/scd.2018.0148. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
5
Designing persuasive health education for patients seeking unproven stem cell interventions.
Stem Cell Reports. 2023 Aug 8;18(8):1549-1554. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2023.06.004.
8
Can civil lawsuits stem the tide of direct-to-consumer marketing of unproven stem cell interventions.
NPJ Regen Med. 2018 Feb 19;3:5. doi: 10.1038/s41536-018-0043-6. eCollection 2018.
9
RxLegal: A Rapid Review of Right-To-Try.
Hosp Pharm. 2018 Jul;53(4):234-235. doi: 10.1177/0018578718783992. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Advancements and challenges in stem cell transplantation for regenerative medicine.
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 10;10(16):e35836. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35836. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.

本文引用的文献

2
Tiered approach to considering orthobiologics for patients with musculoskeletal conditions.
Br J Sports Med. 2023 Feb;57(3):179-180. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-106494. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
3
The two-bucket problem of unproven stem cell interventions.
Regen Med. 2023 Jan;18(1):19-21. doi: 10.2217/rme-2022-0124. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
4
Weighing up the evidence used by direct-to-consumer stem cell businesses.
Stem Cell Reports. 2021 Dec 14;16(12):2852-2860. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.10.007. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
5
The American stem cell sell in 2021: U.S. businesses selling unlicensed and unproven stem cell interventions.
Cell Stem Cell. 2021 Nov 4;28(11):1891-1895. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2021.10.008.
7
POLICY POLARIZATION AND DEATH IN THE UNITED STATES.
Temple Law Rev. 2020 Summer;92(4):889-916.
9
Regulation Without Representation: Cardiac Device Patient Knowledge and Attitudes About the FDA Regulatory Process.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 Aug;13(8):e008561. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008561. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验