Dantes Goeto, Grady Zachary J, Weeks Ahna, Forrester Nathaniel, Trinidad Jose B, Stokes Alexis, Dutreuil Valerie L, Cheng Annie, Kim Phillip, Smith Randi N, Ramos Christopher R, Todd Samual R, Smith Alexis, Sciarretta Jason D
Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 May 17. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004262.
Pediatric lower extremity vascular injury (PLEVI) is uncommon. Though epidemiologic studies exist, the availability of granular data is sparse. Additionally, few studies compare the management between adult (ATC) and pediatric (PTC) trauma centers. The objective of this study was to analyze the surgical management of PLEVIs between a Level I ATC and a Level 1 PTCs in our metropolitan area.
We performed a retrospective review of all PLEVIs (age < 18 years) managed surgically between 01/2009–12/2022. Demographics, clinical and outcome data were obtained and compared between centers. Primary outcomes included amputation and fasciotomy rates. Secondary outcomes included type of vessel repair, mortality, and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay.
Seventy-nine patients were identified, 41 at the ATC and 38 at the PTC totaling 111 vessels injured. Overall, 84.8% were male. ATC patients were older (median 16.0 vs 12.5) and almost exclusively (97.6% vs 29.0%) gunshot wounds. There was no difference in ISS. The popliteal artery was the most injured vessel, ATC (50%) and PTC (40%). Vascular surgeons managed 50% of injuries at ATC vs 60.5% of injuries at the PTC (p=0.35). Rates of arterial or venous repair, ligation, or grafting were not significantly different. Amputations were uncommon at both centers and not significantly different. Seventeen patients (44.7%) required fasciotomies at the PTC vs 21 (51.2%) at the ATC (p=0.56). There was no significant difference in mortality, ICU, or hospital length of stay.
PLEVI have acceptable outcomes (low amputation and/or fasciotomy rates, low mortality) and are managed uniformly between ATCs and PTCs. This data adds important context to the management of PLEVI.
小儿下肢血管损伤(PLEVI)并不常见。尽管存在流行病学研究,但详细数据却很稀少。此外,很少有研究比较成人创伤中心(ATC)和小儿创伤中心(PTC)的治疗情况。本研究的目的是分析我们大都市地区一级ATC和一级PTC之间PLEVI的外科治疗情况。
我们对2009年1月至2022年12月期间接受手术治疗的所有PLEVI(年龄<18岁)进行了回顾性研究。获取了人口统计学、临床和结局数据,并在各中心之间进行了比较。主要结局包括截肢率和筋膜切开率。次要结局包括血管修复类型、死亡率、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和住院时间。
共确定79例患者,ATC有41例,PTC有38例,共111条血管受伤。总体而言,84.8%为男性。ATC患者年龄较大(中位数16.0岁对12.5岁),几乎全部(97.6%对29.0%)为枪伤。损伤严重程度评分(ISS)无差异。腘动脉是最常受伤的血管,ATC为50%,PTC为40%。血管外科医生处理了ATC 50%的损伤,而PTC为60.5%(p=0.35)。动脉或静脉修复、结扎或移植的发生率无显著差异。两个中心的截肢情况均不常见,且无显著差异。PTC有17例患者(44.7%)需要进行筋膜切开术,而ATC为21例(51.2%)(p=0.56)。死亡率、ICU住院时间或住院时间无显著差异。
PLEVI的治疗效果良好(截肢和/或筋膜切开率低、死亡率低),ATC和PTC之间的治疗方法一致。这些数据为PLEVI的治疗提供了重要参考。