Primary Health Care of the Capital Area, Department of Family Medicine, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Sleep. 2024 Apr 12;47(4). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsae035.
Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a major symptom of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Traditional polysomnographic (PSG) measures only partially explain EDS in OSA. This study analyzed traditional and novel PSG characteristics of two different measures of EDS among patients with OSA.
Sleepiness was assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (>10 points defined as "risk of dozing") and a measure of general sleepiness (feeling sleepy ≥ 3 times/week defined as "feeling sleepy"). Four sleepiness phenotypes were identified: "non-sleepy," "risk of dozing only," "feeling sleepy only," and "both at risk of dozing and feeling sleepy."
Altogether, 2083 patients with OSA (69% male) with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5 events/hour were studied; 46% were "non-sleepy," 26% at "risk of dozing only," 7% were "feeling sleepy only," and 21% reported both. The two phenotypes at "risk of dozing" had higher AHI, more severe hypoxemia (as measured by oxygen desaturation index, minimum and average oxygen saturation [SpO2], time spent < 90% SpO2, and hypoxic impacts) and they spent less time awake, had shorter sleep latency, and higher heart rate response to arousals than "non-sleepy" and "feeling sleepy only" phenotypes. While statistically significant, effect sizes were small. Sleep stages, frequency of arousals, wake after sleep onset and limb movement did not differ between sleepiness phenotypes after adjusting for confounders.
In a large international group of patients with OSA, PSG characteristics were weakly associated with EDS. The physiological measures differed among individuals characterized as "risk of dozing" or "non-sleepy," while "feeling sleepy only" did not differ from "non-sleepy" individuals.
日间嗜睡(EDS)是阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的主要症状。传统的多导睡眠图(PSG)测量仅部分解释了 OSA 中的 EDS。本研究分析了 OSA 患者两种不同 EDS 测量方法的传统和新型 PSG 特征。
使用 Epworth 嗜睡量表(>10 分定义为“瞌睡风险”)和一般嗜睡测量(每周嗜睡≥3 次定义为“嗜睡”)评估嗜睡。确定了 4 种嗜睡表型:“不嗜睡”、“仅瞌睡风险”、“仅嗜睡”和“既瞌睡风险又嗜睡”。
共研究了 2083 例 OSA(69%为男性)患者,其呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)≥5 次/小时;46%为“不嗜睡”,26%为“仅瞌睡风险”,7%为“仅嗜睡”,21%为两者兼有。两种“瞌睡风险”表型的 AHI 更高,更严重的低氧血症(用氧减指数、最低和平均血氧饱和度[SpO2]、<90%SpO2 时间和缺氧影响来衡量),并且他们清醒时间更少,睡眠潜伏期更短,对唤醒的心率反应更高,与“不嗜睡”和“仅嗜睡”表型相比。虽然具有统计学意义,但效应大小较小。调整混杂因素后,睡眠阶段、唤醒次数、睡眠起始后觉醒和肢体运动在嗜睡表型之间没有差异。
在一组大型国际 OSA 患者中,PSG 特征与 EDS 相关性较弱。在被描述为“瞌睡风险”或“不嗜睡”的个体中,生理测量结果存在差异,而“仅嗜睡”与“不嗜睡”个体没有差异。