British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
NEJM Evid. 2023 Nov;2(11):EVIDoa2300042. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2300042. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
The primary end point in most heart failure (HF) trials is a composite of time to a first worsening HF event or cardiovascular death. Prevention of recurrent events and improvements in symptoms/quality of life are also important for patients but are usually analyzed separately. Win statistics can integrate all these outcomes into a single composite end point, which is analyzed in hierarchical order, reflecting the clinical importance of each component. METHODS: The Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure (DAPA-HF, n=4744) and Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the Lives of Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure (DELIVER, n=6263) trials enrolled patients with New York Heart Association class II, III, or IV HF, elevated natriuretic peptides, and either an ejection fraction of 40% or less (DAPA-HF) or greater than 40% and left atrial enlargement/left ventricular hypertrophy (DELIVER). We examined the effects of dapagliflozin compared with placebo on a hierarchical composite outcome, including cardiovascular death, total (first and recurrent) HF hospitalizations, total urgent HF visits, and improvement/deterioration in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score (KCCQ-TSS; range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating fewer symptoms and physical limitations) at 8 months. RESULTS: For this composite outcome, the win ratio was 1.30 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23 to 1.36) in the pooled cohort, 1.33 (95% CI, 1.23 to 1.43) in the DAPA-HF trial, and 1.27 (95% CI, 1.18 to 1.36) in the DELIVER trial. Win odds and net benefit in overall patients were 1.19 (95% CI, 1.14 to 1.24) and 8.7% (95% CI, 6.6 to 10.9%), respectively. In the overall pooled cohort, the majority of wins and losses were accounted for by KCCQ-TSS; 52.4% were settled by the KCCQ-TSS tier in the pooled cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In both the DAPA-HF and DELIVER trials, dapagliflozin led to a significant improvement in composite outcomes that incorporated patient-reported outcomes along with total HF events, as well as cardiovascular deaths. These analyses provided a comprehensive presentation of win statistics and illustrated the utility and flexibility of win statistics in describing the effects of dapagliflozin in two recent clinical trials in patients with HF. (Funded by British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence and others; clinical trial registration numbers, NCT03036124 and NCT03619213.)
大多数心力衰竭(HF)试验的主要终点是首次恶化 HF 事件或心血管死亡的时间复合。预防复发事件和改善症状/生活质量对患者也很重要,但通常分别进行分析。赢分统计可以将所有这些结果整合为一个单一的复合终点,并按层次顺序进行分析,反映每个组成部分的临床重要性。方法:达格列净和预防心力衰竭不良结局(DAPA-HF,n=4744)和达格列净评估改善射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者生活质量(DELIVER,n=6263)试验招募了纽约心脏协会 II、III 或 IV 级 HF、升高的利钠肽、射血分数为 40%或更低(DAPA-HF)或大于 40%和左心房扩大/左心室肥厚(DELIVER)的患者。我们检查了与安慰剂相比,达格列净对分层复合结局的影响,包括心血管死亡、全因(首次和复发)HF 住院、全因紧急 HF 就诊和堪萨斯城心肌病问卷总症状评分(KCCQ-TSS;范围为 0 至 100,得分越高表示症状和身体限制越少)在 8 个月时的改善/恶化。结果:对于该复合结局,汇总队列中的赢比值为 1.30(95%置信区间[CI],1.23 至 1.36),DAPA-HF 试验中为 1.33(95%CI,1.23 至 1.43),DELIVER 试验中为 1.27(95%CI,1.18 至 1.36)。总体患者的赢赔率和净效益分别为 1.19(95%CI,1.14 至 1.24)和 8.7%(95%CI,6.6 至 10.9%)。在整个汇总队列中,大多数赢和输都是由 KCCQ-TSS 决定的;在汇总队列中,52.4%的 KCCQ-TSS 层解决。结论:在 DAPA-HF 和 DELIVER 试验中,达格列净均显著改善了复合结局,其中包括患者报告的结局以及全因 HF 事件和心血管死亡。这些分析提供了赢分统计的综合介绍,并说明了赢分统计在描述 HF 患者两项最近临床试验中达格列净效果的实用性和灵活性。(由英国心脏基金会卓越研究中心等资助;临床试验注册号,NCT03036124 和 NCT03619213。)