Suppr超能文献

研究评估钝性胸部创伤在线资源的可读性和视觉外观:使用混合方法评估在线资源。

Study to evaluate the readability and visual appearance of online resources for blunt chest trauma: an evaluation of online resources using mixed methods.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK

School of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 6;14(2):e078552. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078552.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Blunt chest trauma (BCT) is characterised by forceful and non-penetrative impact to the chest region. Increased access to the internet has led to online healthcare resources becoming used by the public to educate themselves about medical conditions. This study aimed to determine whether online resources for BCT are at an appropriate readability level and visual appearance for the public.

DESIGN

We undertook a (1) a narrative overview assessment of the website; (2) a visual assessment of the identified website material content using an adapted framework of predetermined key criteria based on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services toolkit and (3) a readability assessment using five readability scores and the Flesch reading ease score using Readable software.

DATA SOURCES

Using a range of key search terms, we searched Google, Bing and Yahoo websites on 9 October 2023 for online resources about BCT.

RESULTS

We identified and assessed 85 websites. The median visual assessment score for the identified websites was 22, with a range of -14 to 37. The median readability score generated was 9 (14-15 years), with a range of 4.9-15.8. There was a significant association between the visual assessment and readability scores with a tendency for websites with lower readability scores having higher scores for the visual assessment (Spearman's r=-0.485; p<0.01). The median score for Flesch reading ease was 63.9 (plain English) with a range of 21.1-85.3.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the readability levels and visual appearance were acceptable for the public for many websites, many of the resources had much higher readability scores than the recommended level (8-10) and visually were poor.Better use of images would improve the appearance of websites further. Less medical terminology and shorter word and sentence length would also allow the public to comprehend the contained information more easily.

摘要

目的

钝性胸部创伤(BCT)的特征是胸部受到强力和非穿透性的冲击。互联网的普及使得公众可以利用在线医疗资源来了解自己的医疗状况。本研究旨在确定 BCT 的在线资源在公众可理解性和视觉呈现方面是否达到适当的水平。

设计

我们进行了(1)对网站的叙述性概述评估;(2)使用基于医疗保险和医疗补助服务工具包的预先确定关键标准的改编框架对已识别网站材料内容进行视觉评估;(3)使用五种可读性评分和可读性软件的 Flesch 阅读舒适度评分进行可读性评估。

数据来源

我们于 2023 年 10 月 9 日使用一系列关键搜索词在 Google、Bing 和 Yahoo 网站上搜索关于 BCT 的在线资源。

结果

我们确定并评估了 85 个网站。已识别网站的中位数视觉评估得分为 22,范围为-14 至 37。生成的中位数可读性评分为 9(14-15 岁),范围为 4.9-15.8。视觉评估和可读性评分之间存在显著关联,具有较低可读性评分的网站往往具有较高的视觉评估评分(Spearman r=-0.485;p<0.01)。Flesch 阅读舒适度的中位数评分为 63.9(普通英语),范围为 21.1-85.3。

结论

尽管许多网站的可读性水平和视觉呈现对公众来说是可以接受的,但许多资源的可读性得分远高于推荐水平(8-10),并且视觉效果较差。更好地使用图像将进一步改善网站的外观。减少医疗术语的使用以及缩短单词和句子的长度也将使公众更容易理解所包含的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbe0/10860042/5c01cd6ce4a1/bmjopen-2023-078552f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验