Poulos Demitria A, Keith James S, Froehler Michael T, Good Bryan C
Mechanical, Aerospace, and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Cerebrovascular Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Feb 6:15910199241230364. doi: 10.1177/15910199241230364.
Mechanical thrombectomy via direct aspiration is a rapid treatment for acute ischemic stroke. This method often results in the partial ingestion of the clot or "corking" of the catheter tip. Cyclic aspiration may take advantage of the mechanical properties of the clot, resulting in greater clot ingestion and overall procedure success.
An analysis was performed comparing static and cyclic (plunger technique) aspiration. Embolus analogs were used to create occlusions in a mock circulatory flow loop, and one aspiration attempt (first pass effect) using either a static or plunger technique was performed. The percent ingestion of each embolus analog was recorded for each trial.
Static aspiration for 0% and 50% hematocrit embolus analogs resulted in ingestions of 12.8 ± 4.6% and 15.1 ± 10.0%, respectively, while plunger technique (cyclic) aspiration resulted in 15.8 ± 7.3% and 34.4 ± 19.5% ingestion. Complete ingestion was observed only with 50% hematocrit analogs, occurring in 30% of plunger and 10% of static cases. Statistical differences were determined between the two aspiration techniques for the 50% hematocrit samples, with the plunger technique yielding significantly more ingestion. In addition, the plunger technique was shown to maintain a negative vacuum pressure throughout the duration of cyclic plunging.
The plunger technique for manual cyclic aspiration resulted in higher rates of complete ingestion and greater average % ingestions when compared to static aspiration. Increased clot ingestion can result in a higher rate of complete reperfusion during the first aspiration attempt, maximizing the number of patients with good clinical outcomes.
直接抽吸机械取栓术是治疗急性缺血性卒中的一种快速方法。这种方法常常导致部分血栓被吸入或导管尖端出现“堵塞”情况。循环抽吸可能会利用血栓的机械特性,从而使更多血栓被吸入并提高整个手术的成功率。
进行了一项比较静态抽吸和循环(柱塞技术)抽吸的分析。使用栓子模拟物在模拟循环血流回路中造成阻塞,并分别采用静态或柱塞技术进行一次抽吸尝试(首过效应)。记录每次试验中每个栓子模拟物的吸入百分比。
对于血细胞比容为0%和50%的栓子模拟物,静态抽吸的吸入率分别为12.8±4.6%和15.1±10.0%,而柱塞技术(循环)抽吸的吸入率分别为15.8±7.3%和34.4±19.5%。仅在血细胞比容为50%的模拟物中观察到完全吸入,柱塞技术组的完全吸入发生率为30%,静态组为10%。对于血细胞比容为50%的样本,两种抽吸技术之间存在统计学差异,柱塞技术的吸入量明显更多。此外,柱塞技术在循环推注过程中始终保持负压。
与静态抽吸相比,手动循环抽吸的柱塞技术导致更高的完全吸入率和更高的平均吸入百分比。增加血栓吸入可在首次抽吸尝试时提高完全再灌注率,使更多患者获得良好的临床结局。