Faisal H, Qamar F, Martinez S, Razmi S E, Oviedo R J, Masud F
Clinical Surgery at Weill Cornell Medical College, USA.
Clinical Surgery at Houston Methodist Academic Institute, USA.
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 23;10(3):e25006. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25006. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
Surgeons commonly perform ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane blocks to manage acute pain following abdominal surgeries. There is no consensus on whether surgeons should undergo basic hands-on training to perform TAP blocks or if video-based learning is sufficient. We theorized that simulation-based learning is superior to video-based learning. In the present study, we present the analysis of technical skills of UGSA-TAP block performance on a live porcine model by general surgery trainees after undergoing video or simulation-based learning.
We performed a prospective, double-blinded, randomized study. Ten surgery residents and two surgery critical-care fellows (n = 12) without prior experience in performing the TAP block were recruited. The participants were randomized either into a video-based or simulation-based training group. After that, all participants performed a TAP block on a live anesthetized pig, which was recorded and scored by three blinded anesthesiologists. All participants completed a post-performance survey to assess their confidence in gaining competency in the UGSA-TAP block. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the differences between the two groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
All simulation-based learning participants successfully performed a survey scan, identified the three muscular layers of the abdominal wall, and identified the transversus abdominis plane compared to 50 %, 50 %, and 33 % video-based learning group participants for the respective parameters (p < 0.05). While some performance metrics showed no statistically significant differences between the groups, substantial effect sizes (Cohen's ℎ up to 1.07) highlighted notable differences in participants' performance. Both groups exhibited confidence in core competencies, with varied rates of satisfactory skill execution. Performance assessed using a global rating scale revealed a higher passing rate for the simulation group (83 % vs. 33 %). Participant feedback via the Likert scale reflected confidence post-training. Inter-rater reliability (0.83-1) confirmed the robustness of study evaluations.
The UGSA-TAP block curriculum should be introduced into the surgical residency programs with an emphasis on simulation-based learning to enhance the procedural skills of the trainees before transitioning to surgical patients.
外科医生通常会进行超声引导下的腹横肌平面阻滞,以管理腹部手术后的急性疼痛。对于外科医生是否应接受基本的实践培训来进行腹横肌平面阻滞,或者基于视频的学习是否足够,目前尚无共识。我们推测基于模拟的学习优于基于视频的学习。在本研究中,我们展示了普通外科住院医师在接受视频或基于模拟的学习后,在活体猪模型上进行超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞操作的技术技能分析。
我们进行了一项前瞻性、双盲、随机研究。招募了10名外科住院医师和2名外科重症监护专科医师(n = 12),他们之前均无进行腹横肌平面阻滞的经验。参与者被随机分为基于视频的培训组或基于模拟的培训组。之后,所有参与者在一只麻醉的活体猪上进行腹横肌平面阻滞,由三名盲态的麻醉医生进行记录和评分。所有参与者完成操作后调查,以评估他们对掌握超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞技能的信心。进行统计分析以评估两组之间的差异。P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
与基于视频的学习组参与者在相应参数上的50%、50%和33%相比,所有基于模拟的学习参与者均成功进行了探查扫描、识别出腹壁的三层肌肉以及识别出腹横肌平面(p < 0.05)。虽然一些操作指标在两组之间没有显示出统计学上的显著差异,但较大的效应量(科恩h高达1.07)突出了参与者操作上的显著差异。两组在核心能力方面均表现出信心,技能执行的满意度有所不同。使用整体评分量表评估的操作显示模拟组的通过率更高(83%对33%)。通过李克特量表获得的参与者反馈反映了培训后的信心。评分者间信度(0.83 - 1)证实了研究评估的稳健性。
超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞课程应引入外科住院医师培训项目,重点是基于模拟的学习,以在过渡到手术患者之前提高学员的操作技能。