Organ Transplant Center.
Departments of Private Medical Center.
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):2855-2864. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001163.
Preservation fluid (PF) contaminations are common in conventional liver transplantation (CLT) and presumably originate from organ or PF exposures to the external environment in a non-strict sterile manner. Such exposures and PF contamination may be avoided in ischaemia-free liver transplantation (IFLT) because of the strict sterile surgical procedures. In this study, the authors evaluated the impact of IFLT on organ PF contamination.
A post-hoc analysis using data from the first randomized controlled trial of IFLT was performed to compare the incidence, pathogenic spectrum of PF contamination, and incidence of early recipient infection between IFLT and CLT. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore risk factors for PF contamination.
Of the 68 cases recruited in the trial, 64 were included in this post-hoc analysis. The incidence of culture-positive PF was 9.4% (3/32) in the IFLT group versus 78.1% (25/32) in the CLT group ( P <0.001). Three microorganisms were isolated from PF in the IFLT group, while 43 were isolated in the CLT group. The recipient infection rate within postoperative day 14 was 3.1% (1/32) in the IFLT group vs 15.6% (5/32) in the CLT group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance ( P =0.196). Multivariate analysis revealed that adopting IFLT is an independent protective factor for culture-positive PF.
PF contamination is substantially decreased in IFLT, and IFLT application is an independent protective factor for PF contamination. Using rigorous sterile measures and effective antibiotic therapy during IFLT may decrease PF contamination.
保存液(PF)污染在传统肝移植(CLT)中很常见,据推测源于器官或 PF 以非严格无菌的方式暴露于外环境。由于严格的无菌手术程序,在无缺血性肝移植(IFLT)中可以避免此类暴露和 PF 污染。在这项研究中,作者评估了 IFLT 对器官 PF 污染的影响。
对 IFLT 的首个随机对照试验的数据进行了回顾性分析,以比较 IFLT 和 CLT 之间 PF 污染的发生率、污染的病原谱和早期受者感染的发生率。多变量逻辑回归用于探讨 PF 污染的危险因素。
在该试验中招募的 68 例患者中,64 例被纳入本回顾性分析。IFLT 组 PF 培养阳性率为 9.4%(3/32),CLT 组为 78.1%(25/32)(P<0.001)。IFLT 组 PF 中分离出 3 种微生物,CLT 组分离出 43 种微生物。IFLT 组术后第 14 天内受者感染率为 3.1%(1/32),CLT 组为 15.6%(5/32),但差异无统计学意义(P=0.196)。多变量分析显示,采用 IFLT 是 PF 培养阳性的独立保护因素。
IFLT 中 PF 污染显著减少,IFLT 的应用是 PF 污染的独立保护因素。在 IFLT 期间采用严格的无菌措施和有效的抗生素治疗可能会减少 PF 污染。