Taboada-Ruiz L, Pardo R, Ruiz B, Díaz-Somoano M, Calvo L F, Paniagua S, Fuente E
Biocarbon, Circularity and Sustainability Group (BC&S), Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología del Carbono (INCAR), CSIC, C/ Francisco Pintado Fe, 26, 33011, Oviedo, Spain.
Department of Chemistry and Applied Physics, Chemical Engineering Area, IMARENABIO, University of León, Avda. Portugal 41, 24071, León, Spain.
Environ Res. 2024 May 15;249:118388. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118388. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
Nowadays, the scarcity of energy resources is promoting the search for alternative energy sources, boosting interest in the use of forest lignocellulosic residue in the energy sector. In this study, the focus is on the energy recovery from two lignocellulosic residues originated during the pruning of ornamental trees (Horse Chestnut, CI, and False Acacia, FA). Both conventional and flash pyrolysis techniques were applied. The experimental pyrolysis variables were obtained from the study of the thermal behaviour of the pruning residues in thermogravimetric analysis. It was carried out under 5 heating rates and kinetic parameters were estimated using Flynn-Wall-Ozawa method. Results denoted higher maximum mass loss rate values for the same release temperature regions under FA experiments. Also, FA samples had lower final residues for the processes. However, activation energy values were so close for both species. FA was also linked to the faster reactions according frequency factor outcomes. Conventional pyrolysis of pruning residues was carried out in a horizontal oven of original design at a heating rate of 25 °C/min, at 750 °C and 60 min of permanence at that temperature; flash pyrolysis was tested in that oven at 750 and 850 °C. In these pyrolysis processes, three fractions were obtained: bio-char, bio-oil and gas. The physicochemical attributes of the bio-chars suggested their potential utility as biofuels (28.4-29.8 MJ/kg), adsorbent precursors or soil additives. Conventional pyrolysis bio-oils had a dominant monoaromatic hydrocarbons nature, with phenols being the most abundant (≥60%), while flash bio-oils contain mainly polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Conventional pyrolysis gases contained up to 60 vol% of CO; flash pyrolysis gases had high combustible gas content (CO, CH, H) and a low CO content (<25 vol%). As a result, their calorific value (18.06 MJ/kg) exhibited a threefold increase compared to the gas produced through conventional pyrolysis (6.04 MJ/kg).
如今,能源资源的稀缺促使人们寻找替代能源,从而提高了对能源领域中森林木质纤维素残渣利用的兴趣。在本研究中,重点是从观赏树木(七叶树,CI,和洋槐,FA)修剪过程中产生的两种木质纤维素残渣中回收能量。采用了常规热解和闪速热解技术。实验热解变量是通过对修剪残渣在热重分析中的热行为研究获得的。实验在5种加热速率下进行,并使用Flynn-Wall-Ozawa方法估算动力学参数。结果表明,在相同的释放温度区域下,FA实验的最大质量损失率值更高。此外,FA样品在热解过程中的最终残渣较少。然而,两种样品的活化能值非常接近。根据频率因子结果,FA也与更快的反应相关。修剪残渣的常规热解在原始设计的卧式炉中进行,加热速率为25℃/min,温度为750℃,在此温度下保持60分钟;闪速热解在该炉中于750℃和850℃下进行测试。在这些热解过程中,得到了三个馏分:生物炭、生物油和气态产物。生物炭的物理化学特性表明它们作为生物燃料(28.4-29.8 MJ/kg)、吸附剂前体或土壤添加剂具有潜在用途。常规热解生物油主要由单环芳烃组成,其中酚类含量最高(≥60%),而闪速热解生物油主要含有多环芳烃。常规热解气体中CO含量高达60 vol%;闪速热解气体中可燃气体含量高(CO、CH、H),CO含量低(<25 vol%)。因此,其热值(18.06 MJ/kg)比常规热解产生的气体(6.04 MJ/kg)增加了两倍。