Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Japan.
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2024 Jun;23(2):147-159.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2024.01.003. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
The significance of angiogenic factors as predictors of second-line (2L) chemotherapy efficacy when combined with angiogenesis inhibitors for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains unestablished.
In this multicenter prospective observational study, 17 angiogenic factors were analyzed in plasma samples collected at pretreatment and progression stages using a Luminex multiplex assay. Patients who received chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (BEV group), FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab (RAM group), or FOLFIRI plus aflibercept (AFL group) as the 2L treatment were included. Interactions between pretreatment and treatment groups for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response rate (RR) were assessed using the propensity-score weighted Cox proportional hazards model.
From February 2018 to September 2020, 283 patients were analyzed in the 2L cohort. A strong interaction was observed for PFS between BEV and RAM with HGF, sNeuropilin-1, sVEGFR-1, and sVEGFR-3. Interactions for RR between the BEV and RAM groups were observed for sNeuropilin-1 and sVEGFR-1. Contrarily, OS, PlGF, sVEGFR-1, and sVEGFR-3 differentiated the treatment effect between BEV and AFL. Plasma samples were evaluable for dynamic analysis in 203 patients. At progression, VEGF-A levels significantly decreased in the BEV group and increased in the RAM and AFL groups.
The pretreatment plasma sVEGFR-1 and sVEGFR-3 levels could be predictive biomarkers for distinguishing BEV and RAM when combined with chemotherapy in 2L mCRC treatment. Based on the VEGF-A dynamics at progression, selecting RAM or AFL for patients with significantly elevated VEGF-A levels may be a 2L treatment strategy, with BEV considered for the third-line treatment.
UMIN000028616.
在转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)中,联合血管生成抑制剂的二线(2L)化疗中,血管生成因子作为预测疗效的指标的意义尚未确定。
本多中心前瞻性观察性研究使用 Luminex 多重分析检测了预处理和进展阶段采集的血浆样本中的 17 种血管生成因子。纳入接受化疗联合贝伐珠单抗(BEV 组)、FOLFIRI 联合雷莫芦单抗(RAM 组)或 FOLFIRI 联合阿柏西普(AFL 组)作为 2L 治疗的患者。采用倾向评分加权 Cox 比例风险模型评估预处理与治疗组之间对无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和缓解率(RR)的交互作用。
2018 年 2 月至 2020 年 9 月,2L 队列分析了 283 例患者。BEV 和 RAM 与 HGF、sNeuropilin-1、sVEGFR-1 和 sVEGFR-3 之间的 PFS 存在强烈的交互作用。BEV 和 RAM 组之间的 RR 交互作用观察到 sNeuropilin-1 和 sVEGFR-1。相反,OS、PlGF、sVEGFR-1 和 sVEGFR-3 区分了 BEV 和 AFL 之间的治疗效果。203 例患者的血浆样本可进行动态分析。进展时,BEV 组 VEGF-A 水平显著降低,RAM 和 AFL 组 VEGF-A 水平升高。
在 2L mCRC 治疗中,联合化疗时,预处理血浆 sVEGFR-1 和 sVEGFR-3 水平可作为区分 BEV 和 RAM 的预测生物标志物。基于进展时 VEGF-A 的动态变化,选择 RAM 或 AFL 治疗 VEGF-A 水平显著升高的患者可能是一种 2L 治疗策略,考虑将 BEV 作为三线治疗。
UMIN000028616。