Suppr超能文献

院前应用骨盆带是否能提高患者生存率?

Does a prehospital applied pelvic binder improve patient survival?

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Injury. 2024 Apr;55(4):111392. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111392. Epub 2024 Jan 29.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Pelvic fractures are serious and oftentimes require immediate medical attention. Pelvic binders have become a critical tool in the management of pelvic injuries, especially in the prehospital setting. Proper application of the pelvic binder is essential to achieve the desired result. This study evaluates the effectiveness of prehospitally applied pelvic binders in improving outcomes for patients with pelvic fractures.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed 66 patients with unstable pelvic ring fracture classified as AO61B or 61C, who were treated at a Level I hospital in the emergency room between January 2014 and December 2018. The ideal position for a pelvic binder was determined, and patients were divided into three sub-groups based on whether they received a pelvic binder in the ideal position, outside the optimal range, or not at all. The primary outcome measure was the survival rate of the patients.

RESULTS

66 trauma patients with unstable pelvic fractures were enrolled, with a mean age of 53.8 years, who presented to our ER between 2014 and 2018. The mean ISS score was 21.9, with 60.3 % of patients having a moderate to severe injury (ISS > 16 points). Pelvic binder usage did not differ significantly between patients with an ISS < or ≥ 16 points. A total of 9 patients (13.6 %) died during hospitalization, with a mean survival time of 8.1 days. The survival rate did not differ significantly between patients with or without a pelvic binder, or between those with an ideally placed pelvic binder versus those with a binder outside the ideal range. The ISS score, heart rate, blood pressure at admission, and hemoglobin level were significantly different between the group of patients who died and those who survived, indicating their importance in predicting outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Our study found that prehospital pelvic binders did not significantly impact patient outcomes for unstable pelvic fractures, with injury severity score (ISS) being the strongest predictor of survival. Assessing injury severity and managing blood loss remain crucial for these patients. While pelvic binders may not impact survival significantly, they still play a role in stabilizing pelvic fractures and managing blood loss.

摘要

简介

骨盆骨折较为严重,往往需要立即进行医疗处理。骨盆固定带已成为骨盆损伤处理的重要工具,尤其是在院前环境下。正确使用骨盆固定带对于达到预期效果至关重要。本研究评估了院前应用骨盆固定带对骨盆骨折患者治疗效果的影响。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,分析了 2014 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间在一级医院急诊室接受治疗的 66 例不稳定骨盆环骨折患者(AO61B 或 61C 型)。确定了骨盆固定带的理想位置,并根据患者是否处于理想位置、理想位置以外或完全未使用骨盆固定带将其分为三组。主要观察指标为患者生存率。

结果

共纳入 66 例不稳定骨盆骨折创伤患者,平均年龄为 53.8 岁,2014 年至 2018 年期间在我院急诊就诊。ISS 平均评分为 21.9 分,60.3%的患者损伤程度为中度至重度(ISS>16 分)。ISS<16 分与 ISS≥16 分的患者之间,骨盆固定带使用率无显著差异。共有 9 例(13.6%)患者在住院期间死亡,平均生存时间为 8.1 天。骨盆固定带的使用与患者生存率之间无显著差异,无论是否使用骨盆固定带,或骨盆固定带是否位于理想位置,患者生存率均无显著差异。ISS 评分、心率、入院时血压和血红蛋白水平在死亡组和存活组之间存在显著差异,表明这些因素在预测结果方面具有重要意义。

结论

本研究发现,院前骨盆固定带对不稳定骨盆骨折患者的预后无显著影响,损伤严重程度评分(ISS)是预测生存率的最强指标。评估损伤严重程度和控制出血对这些患者仍然至关重要。虽然骨盆固定带对生存率的影响可能不显著,但它们仍在稳定骨盆骨折和控制出血方面发挥作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验