Kilinc Hasan Erkan, Onan Dilara, Ulger Ozlem
Spine Health Unit, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Spine Health Unit, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2024 Apr;70:102919. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.102919. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
Bruxism is a common problem associated with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). The aim of this study was to compare a patient group with Myofascial TMD and bruxism and a healthy control group in terms of masseter and temporal muscle thickness (clenching and resting), mechanosensitivity of neck and jaw muscles, craniofacial pain, and disability and emotional stress status.
The study included 31 patients with myofascial TMD and bruxism (19 females, 12 males) with a mean age of 29.96 ± 8.12 years (range, 18-45 years), and a control group of 31 healthy subjects (19 females, 12 males) with a mean age of 27.58 ± 9.39 years years (range, 18-45 years). Masseter and temporal muscle thicknesses were evaluated with a mobile ultrasound device both at rest and when clenching the jaw. The mechanosensitivity values between the upper trapezius, obliquus capitis inferior, masseter and temporal muscles were measured with a digital algometer device. Craniofacial pain and disability level were evaluated with the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Index (CFPDI), and emotional stress levels with the Perceived Stress Scale-14 (PSS-14).
No difference was determined between the two groups in respect of the clenching and resting ratios of muscle thickness in any muscle (p > 0.05). The mechanosensitivity values in all muscles were lower in the myofascial TMD group than in the healthy group (p < 0.05). The CFPDI and PSS-14 scores were higher in the myofascial TMD group (p < 0.05). There was a moderate positive correlation between CFPDI, PSS-14 and Bruxism Frequency Score (p < 0.05).
The difference in mechanosensitivity and CFPDI values between the myofascial TMD patients with bruxism and the healthy control group indicates that the problem in this patient group has effects in the craniocervical and cervical regions. In addition, the correlation between CFPDI, PSS-14 and Bruxism Frequency Score in myofascial TMD patients suggests that this problem may be affected by the interaction of different parameters.
磨牙症是与颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)相关的常见问题。本研究的目的是比较肌筋膜性TMD伴磨牙症患者组和健康对照组在咬肌和颞肌厚度(紧咬和休息时)、颈部和颌部肌肉的机械敏感性、颅面部疼痛、功能障碍及情绪应激状态方面的差异。
本研究纳入31例肌筋膜性TMD伴磨牙症患者(19例女性,12例男性),平均年龄29.96±8.12岁(范围18 - 45岁),以及31名健康受试者作为对照组(19例女性,12例男性),平均年龄27.58±9.39岁(范围18 - 45岁)。使用便携式超声设备评估咬肌和颞肌在休息及紧咬颌部时的厚度。使用数字痛觉计测量斜方肌上部、头下斜肌、咬肌和颞肌之间的机械敏感性值。采用颅面部疼痛和功能障碍指数(CFPDI)评估颅面部疼痛和功能障碍水平,采用感知应激量表 - 14(PSS - 14)评估情绪应激水平。
两组在任何肌肉的肌肉厚度紧咬和休息比值方面均未发现差异(p>0.05)。肌筋膜性TMD组所有肌肉的机械敏感性值均低于健康组(p<0.05)。肌筋膜性TMD组的CFPDI和PSS - 14评分更高(p<0.05)。CFPDI、PSS - 14与磨牙症频率评分之间存在中度正相关(p<0.05)。
肌筋膜性TMD伴磨牙症患者与健康对照组在机械敏感性和CFPDI值上的差异表明,该患者组的问题在颅颈和颈部区域有影响。此外,肌筋膜性TMD患者中CFPDI、PSS - 14与磨牙症频率评分之间的相关性表明,该问题可能受不同参数相互作用的影响。