Verma Tanvi, Papadantonakis Nikolaos, Peker Barclift Deniz, Zhang Linsheng
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 25;16(3):514. doi: 10.3390/cancers16030514.
Myelofibrosis (MF) is an essential element of primary myelofibrosis, whereas secondary MF may develop in the advanced stages of other myeloid neoplasms, especially polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Over the last two decades, advances in molecular diagnostic techniques, particularly the integration of next-generation sequencing in clinical laboratories, have revolutionized the diagnosis, classification, and clinical decision making of myelofibrosis. Driver mutations involving , , and induce hyperactivity in the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, which plays a central role in cell survival and proliferation. Approximately 80% of myelofibrosis cases harbor additional mutations, frequently in the genes responsible for epigenetic regulation and RNA splicing. Detecting these mutations is crucial for diagnosing myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), especially in cases where no mutations are present in the three driver genes (triple-negative MPNs). While fibrosis in the bone marrow results from the disturbance of inflammatory cytokines, it is fundamentally associated with mutation-driven hematopoiesis. The mutation profile and order of acquiring diverse mutations influence the MPN phenotype. Mutation profiling reveals clonal diversity in MF, offering insights into the clonal evolution of neoplastic progression. Prognostic prediction plays a pivotal role in guiding the treatment of myelofibrosis. Mutation profiles and cytogenetic abnormalities have been integrated into advanced prognostic scoring systems and personalized risk stratification for MF. Presently, JAK inhibitors are part of the standard of care for MF, with newer generations developed for enhanced efficacy and reduced adverse effects. However, only a minority of patients have achieved a significant molecular-level response. Clinical trials exploring innovative approaches, such as combining hypomethylation agents that target epigenetic regulators, drugs proven effective in myelodysplastic syndrome, or immune and inflammatory modulators with JAK inhibitors, have demonstrated promising results. These combinations may be more effective in patients with high-risk mutations and complex mutation profiles. Expanding mutation profiling studies with more sensitive and specific molecular methods, as well as sequencing a broader spectrum of genes in clinical patients, may reveal molecular mechanisms in cases currently lacking detectable driver mutations, provide a better understanding of the association between genetic alterations and clinical phenotypes, and offer valuable information to advance personalized treatment protocols to improve long-term survival and eradicate mutant clones with the hope of curing MF.
骨髓纤维化(MF)是原发性骨髓纤维化的重要组成部分,而继发性MF可能在其他髓系肿瘤的晚期发生,尤其是真性红细胞增多症和原发性血小板增多症。在过去二十年中,分子诊断技术的进步,特别是下一代测序在临床实验室中的应用,彻底改变了骨髓纤维化的诊断、分类和临床决策。涉及 、 和 的驱动突变会导致JAK-STAT信号通路的过度激活,该通路在细胞存活和增殖中起核心作用。大约80%的骨髓纤维化病例存在其他突变,常见于负责表观遗传调控和RNA剪接的基因中。检测这些突变对于诊断骨髓增殖性肿瘤(MPN)至关重要,尤其是在三个驱动基因均无突变的情况下(三阴性MPN)。虽然骨髓纤维化是由炎性细胞因子紊乱导致的,但从根本上来说与突变驱动的造血过程相关。突变谱和获得不同突变的顺序会影响MPN的表型。突变谱分析揭示了MF中的克隆多样性,为肿瘤进展的克隆进化提供了见解。预后预测在指导骨髓纤维化的治疗中起着关键作用。突变谱和细胞遗传学异常已被纳入MF的先进预后评分系统和个性化风险分层中。目前,JAK抑制剂是MF标准治疗的一部分,新一代药物在疗效增强和不良反应减少方面有所改进。然而,只有少数患者实现了显著的分子水平缓解。探索创新方法的临床试验,如将靶向表观遗传调节剂的低甲基化药物、在骨髓增生异常综合征中被证明有效的药物,或免疫和炎性调节剂与JAK抑制剂联合使用,已显示出有前景的结果。这些联合用药在具有高风险突变和复杂突变谱的患者中可能更有效。采用更灵敏和特异的分子方法扩大突变谱分析研究,以及对临床患者更广泛的基因进行测序,可能会揭示目前缺乏可检测驱动突变的病例中的分子机制,更好地理解基因改变与临床表型之间的关联,并为推进个性化治疗方案提供有价值的信息,以提高长期生存率并根除突变克隆,有望治愈MF。