• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊椎动物的系统发育型脑:从神经管闭合到脑的多样化

The Phylotypic Brain of Vertebrates, from Neural Tube Closure to Brain Diversification.

作者信息

Senovilla-Ganzo Rodrigo, García-Moreno Fernando

机构信息

Achucarro Basque Center for Neuroscience, Scientific Park of the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Spain.

Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain.

出版信息

Brain Behav Evol. 2024;99(1):45-68. doi: 10.1159/000537748. Epub 2024 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1159/000537748
PMID:38342091
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The phylotypic or intermediate stages are thought to be the most evolutionary conserved stages throughout embryonic development. The contrast with divergent early and later stages derived from the concept of the evo-devo hourglass model. Nonetheless, this developmental constraint has been studied as a whole embryo process, not at organ level. In this review, we explore brain development to assess the existence of an equivalent brain developmental hourglass. In the specific case of vertebrates, we propose to split the brain developmental stages into: (1) Early: Neurulation, when the neural tube arises after gastrulation. (2) Intermediate: Brain patterning and segmentation, when the neuromere identities are established. (3) Late: Neurogenesis and maturation, the stages when the neurons acquire their functionality. Moreover, we extend this analysis to other chordates brain development to unravel the evolutionary origin of this evo-devo constraint.

SUMMARY

Based on the existing literature, we hypothesise that a major conservation of the phylotypic brain might be due to the pleiotropy of the inductive regulatory networks, which are predominantly expressed at this stage. In turn, earlier stages such as neurulation are rather mechanical processes, whose regulatory networks seem to adapt to environment or maternal geometries. The later stages are also controlled by inductive regulatory networks, but their effector genes are mostly tissue-specific and functional, allowing diverse developmental programs to generate current brain diversity. Nonetheless, all stages of the hourglass are highly interconnected: divergent neurulation must have a vertebrate shared end product to reproduce the vertebrate phylotypic brain, and the boundaries and transcription factor code established during the highly conserved patterning will set the bauplan for the specialised and diversified adult brain.

KEY MESSAGES

The vertebrate brain is conserved at phylotypic stages, but the highly conserved mechanisms that occur during these brain mid-development stages (Inducing Regulatory Networks) are also present during other stages. Oppositely, other processes as cell interactions and functional neuronal genes are more diverse and majoritarian in early and late stages of development, respectively. These phenomena create an hourglass of transcriptomic diversity during embryonic development and evolution, with a really conserved bottleneck that set the bauplan for the adult brain around the phylotypic stage.

摘要

背景

系统发育型或中间阶段被认为是整个胚胎发育过程中进化上最保守的阶段。这与从进化发育沙漏模型概念衍生出的早期和晚期的差异形成对比。尽管如此,这种发育限制一直被作为一个整体胚胎过程来研究,而非在器官层面。在本综述中,我们探讨大脑发育以评估是否存在等效的大脑发育沙漏。在脊椎动物的特定情况下,我们建议将大脑发育阶段分为:(1)早期:神经胚形成期,即原肠胚形成后神经管出现之时。(2)中间期:脑模式形成和分割期,即神经节身份确立之时。(3)后期:神经发生和成熟期,即神经元获得其功能的阶段。此外,我们将此分析扩展到其他脊索动物的大脑发育,以揭示这种进化发育限制的进化起源。

总结

基于现有文献,我们假设系统发育型大脑的主要保守性可能归因于诱导调控网络的多效性,这些网络主要在这个阶段表达。反过来,诸如神经胚形成等早期阶段更多是机械过程,其调控网络似乎适应环境或母体形态。后期阶段同样由诱导调控网络控制,但其效应基因大多是组织特异性和功能性的,从而允许不同的发育程序产生当前的大脑多样性。尽管如此,沙漏的所有阶段都高度相互关联:不同的神经胚形成必须有一个脊椎动物共有的最终产物来重现脊椎动物的系统发育型大脑,并且在高度保守的模式形成过程中建立的边界和转录因子编码将为特化和多样化的成体大脑设定蓝图。

关键信息

脊椎动物的大脑在系统发育型阶段是保守的,但在这些大脑发育中期阶段(诱导调控网络)出现的高度保守机制在其他阶段也存在。相反,其他过程,如细胞相互作用和功能性神经元基因,分别在发育的早期和晚期更多样化且占主导地位。这些现象在胚胎发育和进化过程中创造了一个转录组多样性的沙漏,在系统发育型阶段附近有一个真正保守的瓶颈,它为成体大脑设定了蓝图。

相似文献

1
The Phylotypic Brain of Vertebrates, from Neural Tube Closure to Brain Diversification.脊椎动物的系统发育型脑:从神经管闭合到脑的多样化
Brain Behav Evol. 2024;99(1):45-68. doi: 10.1159/000537748. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
2
Inverting the hourglass: quantitative evidence against the phylotypic stage in vertebrate development.颠覆沙漏模型:脊椎动物发育中反对系统发育型阶段的定量证据。
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Feb 22;270(1513):341-6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2242.
3
The vertebrate phylotypic stage and an early bilaterian-related stage in mouse embryogenesis defined by genomic information.由基因组信息定义的小鼠胚胎发育中的脊椎动物系统发育阶段和一个早期两侧对称动物相关阶段。
BMC Biol. 2007 Jan 12;5:1. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-5-1.
4
Comparative Transcriptomics Reveals Distinct Patterns of Gene Expression Conservation through Vertebrate Embryogenesis.比较转录组学揭示了脊椎动物胚胎发生过程中基因表达保守性的独特模式。
Genome Biol Evol. 2021 Aug 3;13(8). doi: 10.1093/gbe/evab160.
5
Embryonic lethality is not sufficient to explain hourglass-like conservation of vertebrate embryos.胚胎致死性不足以解释脊椎动物胚胎沙漏样的保守性。
Evodevo. 2018 Mar 16;9:7. doi: 10.1186/s13227-018-0095-0. eCollection 2018.
6
The developmental hourglass model: a predictor of the basic body plan?发育沙漏模型:基本身体结构的预测指标?
Development. 2014 Dec;141(24):4649-55. doi: 10.1242/dev.107318.
7
Inter-embryo gene expression variability recapitulates the hourglass pattern of evo-devo.胚胎间基因表达的可变性再现了进化发育的沙漏模式。
BMC Biol. 2020 Sep 19;18(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-00842-z.
8
Constrained vertebrate evolution by pleiotropic genes.受多效基因约束的脊椎动物进化。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Nov;1(11):1722-1730. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0318-0. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
9
In search of the vertebrate phylotypic stage: a molecular examination of the developmental hourglass model and von Baer's third law.寻找脊椎动物的系统发育型阶段:发育沙漏模型与冯·贝尔第三定律的分子检验
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2005 Mar 15;304(2):150-8. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.21033.
10
An explanatory evo-devo model for the developmental hourglass.一种关于发育沙漏的解释性演化发育模型。
F1000Res. 2014 Jul 8;3:156. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.4583.2. eCollection 2014.