Senovilla-Ganzo Rodrigo, García-Moreno Fernando
Achucarro Basque Center for Neuroscience, Scientific Park of the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Spain.
Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain.
Brain Behav Evol. 2024;99(1):45-68. doi: 10.1159/000537748. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
The phylotypic or intermediate stages are thought to be the most evolutionary conserved stages throughout embryonic development. The contrast with divergent early and later stages derived from the concept of the evo-devo hourglass model. Nonetheless, this developmental constraint has been studied as a whole embryo process, not at organ level. In this review, we explore brain development to assess the existence of an equivalent brain developmental hourglass. In the specific case of vertebrates, we propose to split the brain developmental stages into: (1) Early: Neurulation, when the neural tube arises after gastrulation. (2) Intermediate: Brain patterning and segmentation, when the neuromere identities are established. (3) Late: Neurogenesis and maturation, the stages when the neurons acquire their functionality. Moreover, we extend this analysis to other chordates brain development to unravel the evolutionary origin of this evo-devo constraint.
Based on the existing literature, we hypothesise that a major conservation of the phylotypic brain might be due to the pleiotropy of the inductive regulatory networks, which are predominantly expressed at this stage. In turn, earlier stages such as neurulation are rather mechanical processes, whose regulatory networks seem to adapt to environment or maternal geometries. The later stages are also controlled by inductive regulatory networks, but their effector genes are mostly tissue-specific and functional, allowing diverse developmental programs to generate current brain diversity. Nonetheless, all stages of the hourglass are highly interconnected: divergent neurulation must have a vertebrate shared end product to reproduce the vertebrate phylotypic brain, and the boundaries and transcription factor code established during the highly conserved patterning will set the bauplan for the specialised and diversified adult brain.
The vertebrate brain is conserved at phylotypic stages, but the highly conserved mechanisms that occur during these brain mid-development stages (Inducing Regulatory Networks) are also present during other stages. Oppositely, other processes as cell interactions and functional neuronal genes are more diverse and majoritarian in early and late stages of development, respectively. These phenomena create an hourglass of transcriptomic diversity during embryonic development and evolution, with a really conserved bottleneck that set the bauplan for the adult brain around the phylotypic stage.
系统发育型或中间阶段被认为是整个胚胎发育过程中进化上最保守的阶段。这与从进化发育沙漏模型概念衍生出的早期和晚期的差异形成对比。尽管如此,这种发育限制一直被作为一个整体胚胎过程来研究,而非在器官层面。在本综述中,我们探讨大脑发育以评估是否存在等效的大脑发育沙漏。在脊椎动物的特定情况下,我们建议将大脑发育阶段分为:(1)早期:神经胚形成期,即原肠胚形成后神经管出现之时。(2)中间期:脑模式形成和分割期,即神经节身份确立之时。(3)后期:神经发生和成熟期,即神经元获得其功能的阶段。此外,我们将此分析扩展到其他脊索动物的大脑发育,以揭示这种进化发育限制的进化起源。
基于现有文献,我们假设系统发育型大脑的主要保守性可能归因于诱导调控网络的多效性,这些网络主要在这个阶段表达。反过来,诸如神经胚形成等早期阶段更多是机械过程,其调控网络似乎适应环境或母体形态。后期阶段同样由诱导调控网络控制,但其效应基因大多是组织特异性和功能性的,从而允许不同的发育程序产生当前的大脑多样性。尽管如此,沙漏的所有阶段都高度相互关联:不同的神经胚形成必须有一个脊椎动物共有的最终产物来重现脊椎动物的系统发育型大脑,并且在高度保守的模式形成过程中建立的边界和转录因子编码将为特化和多样化的成体大脑设定蓝图。
脊椎动物的大脑在系统发育型阶段是保守的,但在这些大脑发育中期阶段(诱导调控网络)出现的高度保守机制在其他阶段也存在。相反,其他过程,如细胞相互作用和功能性神经元基因,分别在发育的早期和晚期更多样化且占主导地位。这些现象在胚胎发育和进化过程中创造了一个转录组多样性的沙漏,在系统发育型阶段附近有一个真正保守的瓶颈,它为成体大脑设定了蓝图。