Deftereos Spyros N, Vavougios George D, Bakirtzis Christos, Hadjigeorgiou George, Grigoriadis Nikolaos
Second Department of Neurology, Special Unit for Biomedical Research and Education (S.U.B.R.E.), School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Merck S.A., Greece, an Affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Curr Pharm Des. 2024;30(7):536-551. doi: 10.2174/0113816128288102240131053205.
Co-signaling and adhesion molecules are important elements for creating immune synapses between T lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells; they positively or negatively regulate the interaction between a T cell receptor with its cognate antigen, presented by the major histocompatibility complex.
We conducted a systematic review on the effects of High Efficacy Disease Modifying Drugs (HEDMDs) for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) on the co-signaling and adhesion molecules that form the immune synapse.
We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and other sources to identify clinical or preclinical reports on the effects of HEDMDs on co-signaling and adhesion molecules that participate in the formation of immune synapses in patients with MS or other autoimmune disorders. We included reports on cladribine tablets, anti- CD20 monoclonal antibodies, S1P modulators, inhibitors of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase, and natalizumab.
In 56 eligible reports among 7340 total publications, limited relevant evidence was uncovered. Not all co-signaling and adhesion molecules have been studied in relation to every HEDMD, with more data being available on the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (that affect CD80, CD86, GITR and TIGIT), cladribine tablets (affecting CD28, CD40, ICAM-1, LFA-1) and the S1P modulators (affecting CD86, ICAM-1 and LFA-1) and less on Natalizumab (affecting CD80, CD86, CD40, LFA-1, VLA-4) and Alemtuzumab (affecting GITR and CTLA-4).
The puzzle of HEDMD effects on the immune synapse is far from complete. The available evidence suggests that distinguishing differences exist between drugs and are worth pursuing further.
共刺激分子和黏附分子是在T淋巴细胞和抗原呈递细胞之间形成免疫突触的重要元素;它们正向或负向调节T细胞受体与其由主要组织相容性复合体呈递的同源抗原之间的相互作用。
我们对高效疾病修饰药物(HEDMDs)治疗多发性硬化症(MS)对形成免疫突触的共刺激分子和黏附分子的影响进行了系统评价。
我们检索了EMBASE、MEDLINE和其他来源,以确定关于HEDMDs对参与MS或其他自身免疫性疾病患者免疫突触形成的共刺激分子和黏附分子影响的临床或临床前报告。我们纳入了关于克拉屈滨片、抗CD20单克隆抗体、S1P调节剂、布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂和那他珠单抗的报告。
在总共7340篇出版物中的56篇合格报告中,发现的相关证据有限。并非所有共刺激分子和黏附分子都已针对每种HEDMD进行研究,关于抗CD20单克隆抗体(影响CD80、CD86、糖皮质激素诱导的肿瘤坏死因子受体和TIGIT)、克拉屈滨片(影响CD28、CD40、细胞间黏附分子-1、淋巴细胞功能相关抗原-1)和S1P调节剂(影响CD86、细胞间黏附分子-1和淋巴细胞功能相关抗原-1)的数据较多,而关于那他珠单抗(影响CD80、CD86、CD40、淋巴细胞功能相关抗原-1、极迟抗原-4)和阿仑单抗(影响糖皮质激素诱导的肿瘤坏死因子受体和细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关抗原4)的数据较少。
HEDMDs对免疫突触影响的谜团远未解开。现有证据表明,不同药物之间存在显著差异,值得进一步探究。