Suppr超能文献

不同年龄校正的 D-二聚体阈值可排除门诊和住院患者的急性肺栓塞。

Distinct age-adjusted D-dimer threshold to rule out acute pulmonary embolism in outpatients and inpatients.

机构信息

Department of Heart Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.

Department of Cardiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Clin Respir J. 2024 Feb;18(2):e13728. doi: 10.1111/crj.13728.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is combinations of clinical probability assessments, plasma D-dimer (DD) test results, and/or computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to explore the appropriate DD cutoff using the immunoturbidimetric method in outpatients and inpatients.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 2689 patients with suspected PE between January 2014 and December 2019. All patients underwent clinical probability assessments, DD tests, and CTPA. We investigated the appropriate cutoff level for plasma DD tests in the correlation analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Among all patients, 1263 were confirmed acute PE. The age-adjusted DD level was determined to be age × 10 μg/L (for patients aged >50 years) in outpatients. This cutoff value resulted in a sensitivity of 96.75% and a specificity of 87.02%, with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.908 and the number needed to treat (NNT) of 1.18. For inpatients, the age-adjusted cutoff values for the biomarker DD demonstrated poor specificity (13.34%) and NNT (9.88). However, when the DD cutoff was adjusted to 2 × the upper limit of normal (ULN), the sensitivity increased to 93.19%, while the specificity remained at 29.55%, with the AUC of 0.610 and the NNT of 4.76. The optimal DD cut-off value was 3010 μg/L (about 5 × ULN), resulting in a sensitivity of 75.22% and specificity of 61.72%, with the AUC of 0.727 and the NNT of 2.7.

CONCLUSION

Using the immunoturbidimetric method to measure DD, an age-adjusted DD cutoff (age × 10 μg/L, if aged >50 years) should be considered for outpatients with suspected PE. For inpatients, increasing the DD cutoff value to at least 2 × ULN yields the best test performance.

摘要

简介

急性肺栓塞(PE)的诊断是临床可能性评估、血浆 D-二聚体(DD)检测结果和/或计算机断层肺动脉造影(CTPA)的组合。

目的

本研究旨在探讨免疫比浊法在门诊和住院患者中使用的合适 DD 截断值。

方法

我们回顾性纳入了 2014 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月间疑似 PE 的 2689 例患者。所有患者均进行了临床可能性评估、DD 检测和 CTPA。我们在相关分析和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线中研究了血浆 DD 检测的合适截断值水平。

结果

在所有患者中,有 1263 例确诊为急性 PE。在门诊患者中,年龄校正的 DD 水平确定为年龄×10μg/L(年龄>50 岁)。该截断值的灵敏度为 96.75%,特异性为 87.02%,曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.908,治疗需要数(NNT)为 1.18。对于住院患者,生物标志物 DD 的年龄校正截断值显示出较差的特异性(13.34%)和 NNT(9.88)。然而,当将 DD 截断值调整为 2×正常上限(ULN)时,灵敏度提高到 93.19%,特异性保持在 29.55%,AUC 为 0.610,NNT 为 4.76。最佳 DD 截断值为 3010μg/L(约 5×ULN),灵敏度为 75.22%,特异性为 61.72%,AUC 为 0.727,NNT 为 2.7。

结论

使用免疫比浊法测量 DD,疑似 PE 的门诊患者应考虑使用年龄校正的 DD 截断值(年龄>50 岁时为年龄×10μg/L)。对于住院患者,将 DD 截断值提高到至少 2×ULN 可获得最佳的检测性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cced/10859594/fce2e57ab638/CRJ-18-e13728-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验