BACKGROUND: HIV self-testing (HIVST) is a practical and effective way to provide HIV testing services to at-risk and underserved populations, particularly men. Utilizing Village Health Teams (VHTs) could enhance community-based delivery of oral HIVST to reach the last un-tested individuals who may be at-risk of infection. However, little is known about what VHTs and facility-based healthcare workers think about facilitating oral HIVST and delivery of subsequent HIV services. We investigated the views of health providers on oral HIVST delivered by VHTs among men in rural communities in Central Uganda. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study in Mpigi district, interviewing 27 health providers who facilitated oral HIV self-testing among men. The providers consisting of 15 VHTs and 12 facility-based health workers were purposively selected. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and translated to English for a hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis. We used the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) Implementation Science framework to generate and categorize open codes. RESULTS: In terms of reaching men with HIV testing services, the providers considered HIVST to be a fast and convenient method, which could boost HIV testing. However, they also had concerns about its accuracy. In terms of effectiveness, HIVST was perceived as a reliable, user-friendly, and efficient approach to HIV testing. However, it depended on the user's preference for testing algorithms. Regarding adoption, HIVST was considered to enhance autonomy, well-suited for use in the community, and offered opportunities for linkage and re-linkage into care. However, at times HIVST faced hesitance. As for Implementation, VHTs had various support roles in HIVST but had concerns about social insecurities and delays in seeking subsequent facility-based services after HIVST. Regarding Maintenance, providers recommended several ways to improve oral HIVST including; optimizing tracking of HIVST distribution and use, improving linkage and retention in care after HIVST, diversifying HIVST for combined HIV prevention packages and including more languages, broadening sensitization among potential HIVST users and health providers, differentiating distribution models, and prioritizing targeted HIVST efforts. CONCLUSION: HIVST has the potential to increase testing rates and engagement of men in HIV services. However, for it to be implemented on a population-wide scale, continuous sensitization of potential users and health providers is necessary, along with streamlined structures for tracking kit distribution, use, and reporting of results. Further implementation research may be necessary to optimize the role of health providers in facilitating HIVST.