Hartwell Emily E, Jinwala Zeal, Milone Jackson, Ramirez Sarah, Gelernter Joel, Kranzler Henry R, Kember Rachel L
medRxiv. 2024 Jan 23:2024.01.22.24301615. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.22.24301615.
Co-occurring psychiatric, medical, and substance use disorders (SUDs) are common, but the complex pathways leading to such comorbidities are poorly understood. A greater understanding of genetic influences on this phenomenon could inform precision medicine efforts. We used the Yale-Penn dataset, a cross-sectional sample enriched for individuals with SUDs, to examine pleiotropic effects of genetic liability for psychiatric and medical traits. Participants completed an in-depth interview that provides information on demographics, environment, medical illnesses, and psychiatric and SUDs. Polygenic scores (PGS) for psychiatric disorders and medical traits were calculated in European-ancestry (EUR; n=5,691) participants and, when discovery datasets were available, for African-ancestry (AFR; n=4,918) participants. Phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS) were then conducted. In AFR participants, the only PGS with significant associations was bipolar disorder (BD), all of which were with substance use phenotypes. In EUR participants, PGS for major depressive disorder (MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), schizophrenia (SCZ), body mass index (BMI), coronary artery disease (CAD), and type 2 diabetes (T2D) all showed significant associations, the majority of which were with phenotypes in the substance use categories. For instance, PGS was associated with over 200 phenotypes, 15 of which were depression-related (e.g., depression criterion count), 55 of which were other psychiatric phenotypes, and 126 of which were substance use phenotypes; and PGS was associated with 138 phenotypes, 105 of which were substance related. Genetic liability for psychiatric and medical traits is associated with numerous phenotypes across multiple categories, indicative of the broad genetic liability of these traits.
精神疾病、躯体疾病和物质使用障碍(SUDs)共病的情况很常见,但导致这种共病的复杂途径却鲜为人知。对这一现象的遗传影响有更深入的了解可为精准医学研究提供依据。我们使用了耶鲁 - 宾夕法尼亚数据集,这是一个富含SUDs个体的横断面样本,来研究精神和躯体性状的遗传易感性的多效性影响。参与者完成了一项深入访谈,该访谈提供了有关人口统计学、环境、躯体疾病以及精神疾病和SUDs的信息。在欧洲血统(EUR;n = 5691)的参与者中计算了精神疾病和躯体性状的多基因分数(PGS),并且在有发现数据集时,也对非洲血统(AFR;n = 4918)的参与者进行了计算。然后进行了全表型组关联研究(PheWAS)。在AFR参与者中,唯一具有显著关联的PGS是双相情感障碍(BD),所有这些关联均与物质使用表型有关。在EUR参与者中,重度抑郁症(MDD)、广泛性焦虑症(GAD)、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、精神分裂症(SCZ)、体重指数(BMI)、冠状动脉疾病(CAD)和2型糖尿病(T2D)的PGS均显示出显著关联,其中大多数与物质使用类别中的表型有关。例如,PGS 与200多种表型相关,其中15种与抑郁相关(例如,抑郁标准计数),55种是其他精神表型,126种是物质使用表型;PGS 与138种表型相关,其中105种与物质相关。精神和躯体性状的遗传易感性与多个类别中的众多表型相关,表明这些性状具有广泛的遗传易感性。