Suppr超能文献

腰麻下剖宫产术中去氧肾上腺素输注与推注方案的比较:一项评估血流动力学变化的观察性研究

Phenylephrine Infusion Versus Bolus Regimens During Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia: An Observational Study to Assess Hemodynamic Changes.

作者信息

Kannan Harshni, Gnanaprakasam Pughal Vendan, Subramanian Vishwanath, Pm Safneedha

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Sri Muthukumaran Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Chennai, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jan 9;16(1):e51977. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51977. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Background The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two modes of phenylephrine administration, namely continuous infusion and intermittent bolus, in maintaining maternal hemodynamics during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia (SA). Methods Eighty patients undergoing cesarean delivery with SA were allocated into two groups. In group I, 40 patients were administered a prophylactic phenylephrine infusion at a rate of 75 mcg/min immediately after SA. Conversely, group B, consisting of 40 patients, received a 75 mcg bolus dose promptly after SA and subsequently whenever their blood pressure fell by more than 20% from the baseline value. Crucial variables, such as heart rate (HR), blood pressure, and side effects, were closely monitored at a three-minute interval in both groups. Following the delivery of the child, APGAR scores were documented at the first and fifth minutes, and the gathered data underwent analysis using SPSS Statistics, version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Results The results revealed that baseline HR and blood pressure were similar in both groups. Nevertheless, the bolus group exhibited a higher mean HR, whereas the infusion group maintained a closer proximity to the baseline reading throughout the measurement period. Despite these variations, changes in HR did not demonstrate statistically significant differences between the two groups at any measuring intervals. Additionally, the mean systolic blood pressure in group B exhibited an initial decrease from the baseline, whereas group I displayed an increase compared to the baseline values. Importantly, neither group reported instances of nausea or vomiting, and the APGAR scores were comparable between them. Conclusion In conclusion, the study found that a phenylephrine bolus of 75 mcg was more effective in maintaining blood pressure within acceptable limits without causing bradycardia or hypertension when compared to a phenylephrine infusion.

摘要

背景 本研究的目的是评估和比较两种去氧肾上腺素给药方式(即持续输注和间歇性推注)在脊髓麻醉(SA)下剖宫产术中维持产妇血流动力学的效果。方法 80例行SA剖宫产术的患者被分为两组。在第一组中,40例患者在SA后立即以75 mcg/min的速率预防性输注去氧肾上腺素。相反,由40例患者组成的B组在SA后立即接受75 mcg的推注剂量,随后每当其血压从基线值下降超过20%时再次给药。两组均每隔三分钟密切监测关键变量,如心率(HR)、血压和副作用。胎儿娩出后,记录第1分钟和第5分钟的阿氏评分,并使用SPSS Statistics 17.0版(SPSS公司,伊利诺伊州芝加哥)对收集的数据进行分析。结果 结果显示两组的基线HR和血压相似。然而,推注组的平均HR较高,而输注组在整个测量期间更接近基线读数。尽管存在这些差异,但两组在任何测量间隔的HR变化均未显示出统计学上的显著差异。此外,B组的平均收缩压最初较基线下降,而第一组与基线值相比有所升高。重要的是,两组均未报告恶心或呕吐情况,且两组之间的阿氏评分相当。结论 总之,研究发现与去氧肾上腺素输注相比,75 mcg的去氧肾上腺素推注在将血压维持在可接受范围内且不引起心动过缓或高血压方面更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f2/10853493/067286a103e4/cureus-0016-00000051977-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验