Neurological Rehabilitation Centre Godeshoehe GmbH, Bonn, Germany
Division of Performance and Health, Institute for Sport and Sport Science, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 12;14(2):e076333. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076333.
(1) To explore experiences of fatigued persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) with a new multimodal agility-based exercise training (MAT) framework and (2) to investigate the demands of the Rehabilitation, Fatigue, and Exercise (ReFEx) study protocol, which compares high-frequency MAT and 'traditional' strength and endurance training (SET) to identify possible adaptations for a powered randomised controlled trial (RCT).
A qualitative interview study nested within a feasibility RCT, comparing MAT and SET.
Neurological inpatient rehabilitation centre in Germany.
Twenty-two pwMS were recruited for the feasibility study. Six were selected from MAT and SET, respectively, for semistructured face-to-face interviews prior to discharge, following a purposive sampling strategy. Participants had low physical disability but were at least moderately fatigued.
During inpatient rehabilitation (4-6 weeks) MAT participants attended group-based and manual-based MAT sessions in the gym (5×/week, 30 min) and the pool (3×/week, 30 min). SET participants exercised individually on a cycle ergometer (5×/week, 22 min) and on strength training machines (3×/week, 30 min).
Three key categories emerged from the interviews: (1) regarding MAT were variety and playfulness, group setting and challenging exercises. regarding MAT were feeling overburdened, feeling pressured in the group setting and the wish to perform 'traditional' strength training (not part of MAT). (2) MAT were of physical and psychological nature, with improved balance stated the most. (3) described the perceived exertion during MAT and SET, reflecting that there is no accumulation of fatigue during the intervention.
MAT is appreciated by pwMS and includes facilitators less attainable with 'traditional' SET. Evaluation of MAT in a powered RCT is indicated, if rest breaks postsession, and screening for negative self-evaluation and social comparison are considered. Future (qualitative) research should investigate the important factors of inpatient rehabilitation contributing to fatigue reduction in pwMS.
DRKS00023943; German Clinical Trials Register.
(1)探索新的多模式敏捷性为基础的运动训练(MAT)框架下患有多发性硬化症(pwMS)的疲劳患者的体验,(2)研究康复、疲劳和运动(ReFEx)研究方案的要求,该方案比较了高频 MAT 和“传统”力量和耐力训练(SET),以确定电动随机对照试验(RCT)的可能适应性。
嵌套在可行性 RCT 中的定性访谈研究,比较了 MAT 和 SET。
德国神经病学住院康复中心。
为可行性研究招募了 22 名 pwMS。根据目的抽样策略,分别从 MAT 和 SET 中选择 6 名患者,在出院前进行半结构化的面对面访谈。参与者的身体残疾程度较低,但至少有中度疲劳。
在住院康复期间(4-6 周),MAT 参与者参加了健身房(每周 5 次,每次 30 分钟)和游泳池(每周 3 次,每次 30 分钟)的小组和基于手册的 MAT 课程。SET 参与者每周在自行车测力计(每周 5 次,每次 22 分钟)和力量训练机(每周 3 次,每次 30 分钟)上单独锻炼。
访谈中出现了三个关键类别:(1)关于 MAT 的是多样性和趣味性、小组设置和挑战性练习。关于 MAT 的是感到负担过重、在小组环境中感到有压力以及希望进行“传统”力量训练(不是 MAT 的一部分)。(2)MAT 的是身体和心理上的,改善平衡是最主要的。(3)描述了 MAT 和 SET 期间的感知用力,反映出干预期间不会累积疲劳。
MAT 受到 pwMS 的赞赏,并且包括“传统”SET 无法实现的促进因素。如果考虑到干预后休息时间、筛选负面自我评价和社会比较,那么进行 MAT 的电动 RCT 评估是必要的。未来(定性)研究应调查有助于 pwMS 疲劳减轻的住院康复的重要因素。
DRKS00023943;德国临床试验注册中心。