Kell Parker A, Vore Claudia N, Hahn Burkhart J, Payne Michael F, Rhudy Jamie L
Department of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Department of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
J Pain Res. 2024 Feb 8;17:583-598. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S439862. eCollection 2024.
Temporal summation (TS) of pain occurs when pain increases over repeated presentations of identical noxious stimuli. TS paradigms can model central sensitization, a state of hyperexcitability in nociceptive pathways that promotes chronic pain onset and maintenance. Many experimenters use painful heat stimuli to measure TS (TS-heat); yet, TS-heat research faces unresolved challenges, including difficulty evoking summation in up to 30-50% of participants. Moreover, substantial variability exists between laboratories regarding the methods for evoking and calculating TS-heat.
To address these limitations, this study sought to identify optimal parameters for evoking TS-heat in healthy participants with a commercially available constant contact heat stimulator, the Medoc TSA-II. Working within constraints of the TSA-II, stimulus trains with varying parameters (eg, stimulus frequency, baseline temp, peak temp, peak duration, testing site) were tested in a sample of 32 healthy, chronic pain-free participants to determine which combination best evoked TS-heat. To determine whether TS scoring method altered results, TS-heat was scored using three common methods.
Across all methods, only two trains successfully evoked group-level TS-heat. These trains shared the following parameters: site (palmar hand), baseline and peak temperatures (44°C and 50°C, respectively), and peak duration (0.5 s). Both produced summation that peaked at moderate pain (~50 out of 100 rating).
Future TS-heat investigations using constant contact thermodes and fixed protocols may benefit from adopting stimulus parameters that include testing on the palmar hand, using 44°C baseline and 50°C peak temperatures, at ≥0.33 Hz stimulus frequency, and peak pulse durations of at least 0.5 seconds.
当相同的有害刺激重复呈现时疼痛加剧,就会发生疼痛的时间总和(TS)。TS范式可以模拟中枢敏化,即伤害性感受通路中的一种过度兴奋状态,它促进慢性疼痛的发生和维持。许多实验者使用疼痛热刺激来测量TS(TS-热);然而,TS-热研究面临着尚未解决的挑战,包括在高达30%-50%的参与者中难以诱发总和效应。此外,不同实验室在诱发和计算TS-热的方法上存在很大差异。
为解决这些局限性,本研究旨在使用市售的恒压接触热刺激器Medoc TSA-II,确定在健康参与者中诱发TS-热的最佳参数。在TSA-II的限制范围内,对32名健康、无慢性疼痛的参与者样本进行了具有不同参数(如刺激频率、基线温度、峰值温度、峰值持续时间、测试部位)的刺激序列测试,以确定哪种组合最能诱发TS-热。为了确定TS评分方法是否会改变结果,使用三种常用方法对TS-热进行评分。
在所有方法中,只有两个刺激序列成功诱发了组水平的TS-热。这些刺激序列具有以下共同参数:部位(手掌)、基线温度和峰值温度(分别为44°C和50°C)以及峰值持续时间(0.5秒)。两者都产生了总和效应,在中度疼痛时达到峰值(100分制中约为50分)。
未来使用恒压接触热电极和固定方案的TS-热研究,采用包括在手掌进行测试、使用44°C基线温度和50°C峰值温度、≥0.33Hz刺激频率以及至少持续0.5秒的峰值脉冲持续时间等刺激参数可能会有所帮助。