Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):3039-3049. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001189.
This study aims to investigate the effect of concomitant tricuspid valve surgery (TVS) during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation due to the controversy over the clinical outcomes of concomitant TVS in patients undergoing LVAD.
A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed and EMbase from the inception to 1 August 2023. Studies comparing outcomes in adult patients undergoing concomitant TVS during LVAD implantation (TVS group) and those who did not (no-TVS group) were included. The primary outcomes were right heart failure (RHF), right ventricular assist device (RVAD) implantation, and early mortality. All meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models, and a two-tailed P <0.05 was considered significant.
Twenty-one studies were included, and 16 of them were involved in the meta-analysis, with 660 patients in the TVS group and 1291 in the no-TVS group. Patients in the TVS group suffered from increased risks of RHF [risk ratios (RR)=1.31, 95% CI: 1.01-1.70, P =0.04; I2 =38%, pH =0.13), RVAD implantation (RR=1.56, 95% CI: 1.16-2.11, P =0.003; I2 =0%, pH =0.74), and early mortality (RR=1.61, 95% CI: 1.07-2.42, P =0.02; I2 =0%, pH =0.75). Besides, the increased risk of RHF holds true in patients with moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation (RR=1.36, 95% CI: 1.04-1.78, P =0.02). TVS was associated with a prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time. No significant differences in acute kidney injury, reoperation requirement, hospital length of stay, or ICU stay were observed.
Concomitant TVS failed to show benefits in patients undergoing LVAD, and it was associated with increased risks of RHF, RVAD implantation, and early mortality.
本研究旨在探讨左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术中同期行三尖瓣手术(TVS)的效果,因为同期行 TVS 对接受 LVAD 治疗的患者的临床结局存在争议。
从建库至 2023 年 8 月 1 日,在 PubMed 和 EMbase 中进行系统文献检索。纳入比较同期行 TVS 的 LVAD 植入术(TVS 组)和未行 TVS 的 LVAD 植入术(无 TVS 组)成年患者结局的研究。主要结局为右心衰竭(RHF)、右心室辅助装置(RVAD)植入和早期死亡率。所有荟萃分析均采用随机效应模型,双侧 P<0.05 为差异有统计学意义。
共纳入 21 项研究,其中 16 项研究进行了荟萃分析,TVS 组 660 例,无 TVS 组 1291 例。TVS 组患者发生 RHF[风险比(RR)=1.31,95%置信区间:1.01-1.70,P=0.04;I²=38%,pH=0.13]、RVAD 植入(RR=1.56,95%置信区间:1.16-2.11,P=0.003;I²=0%,pH=0.74)和早期死亡率(RR=1.61,95%置信区间:1.07-2.42,P=0.02;I²=0%,pH=0.75)的风险增加。此外,在中重度三尖瓣反流患者中,RHF 的风险增加更为明显(RR=1.36,95%置信区间:1.04-1.78,P=0.02)。同期 TVS 与体外循环时间延长相关。两组患者急性肾损伤、再次手术需求、住院时间和 ICU 住院时间无显著差异。
同期行 TVS 对接受 LVAD 的患者无益,且与 RHF、RVAD 植入和早期死亡率增加相关。